SASJ

On Thu, Aug 29, 2024 at 4:54 PM <ch...@go-mtc.com> wrote:

> Are you using double or triple armor cable?
>
> *From:* Josh Luthman
> *Sent:* Thursday, August 29, 2024 1:43 PM
> *To:* AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group
> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] fiber patch cables
>
> We are something like 80% direct bury.  We pay for it ourselves.  There
> are use cases for both.
>
> Our repair kit is: two handholes, a little bit of fiber, and a pair of
> splice cases.  Like $1000.  This is much cheaper than say $1/foot pipe for
> a million feet (which of course does not guarantee you will not have
> damage).
>
> On Thu, Aug 29, 2024 at 2:11 PM Ken Hohhof <khoh...@kwom.com> wrote:
>
>> We’ve had a lot of fiber installs in the ROW around here (including for a
>> Meta datacenter), almost all buried, combination of directional boring and
>> trenching but I haven’t seen anyone doing direct burial.  It’s all in
>> conduit.  One county it’s something like 4 inch and I was told the county
>> requires that size.  Not sure if conduit and handholes and blown fiber are
>> just the preferred method of construction to make repairs easier, or if
>> it’s a govt requirement to bury stuff in the ROW.
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* AF <af-boun...@af.afmug.com> *On Behalf Of *Josh Luthman
>> *Sent:* Thursday, August 29, 2024 12:47 PM
>> *To:* AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group <af@af.afmug.com>
>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] fiber patch cables
>>
>>
>>
>> >Sometimes just one strand
>>
>> That sucks!
>>
>>
>>
>> So you have a HH every 20k/40k feet with the butt splice?  Nothing in
>> between?
>>
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Aug 29, 2024 at 1:42 PM <ch...@go-mtc.com> wrote:
>>
>> Gophers will kill one fiber at a time.  Sometimes just one strand,
>> sometimes they will eat through the whole cable.  Steel armor and all.
>>
>>
>>
>> Direct bury across the desert, there is no advantage to hand holes.
>> Since you are not blowing you cannot install slack loops.  So the HH is at
>> the splice point.  When you have damage you dig it back and install two HH
>> with slack loops.
>>
>>
>>
>> I don’t build direct bury any more.  But some do.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* Josh Luthman
>>
>> *Sent:* Thursday, August 29, 2024 11:20 AM
>>
>> *To:* AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group
>>
>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] fiber patch cables
>>
>>
>>
>> When the gophers hit, do they get the entire cable or just a healthy bite
>> of the cable.  I'm wondering if you could somehow see the strength of a
>> tone down the armor?
>>
>>
>> How far apart are your HH?  We try to keep it 1320 or 2640 feet at most
>> but we are doing FTTH.
>>
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Aug 29, 2024 at 1:17 PM <ch...@go-mtc.com> wrote:
>>
>> Yes, if it is a strike you don’t even need the OTDR.  Just drive the
>> route and stop where they are digging.
>>
>> Sometimes splices go bad and normally the OTDR indicates a distance very
>> close to a splice point so that is easy too.
>>
>>
>>
>> Gophers, never easy.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* Ken Hohhof
>>
>> *Sent:* Thursday, August 29, 2024 11:06 AM
>>
>> *To:* 'AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group'
>>
>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] fiber patch cables
>>
>>
>>
>> Sounds like gophers are a lot worse than somebody digging in the wrong
>> spot, because once you are close you can just look for the above ground
>> evidence like a hole or an excavator with yellow vest people standing
>> around.
>>
>>
>>
>> What were the critters than Bill Murray was at war with in Caddyshack,
>> were those gophers?  Dumb movie, but iconic I guess.
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* AF <af-boun...@af.afmug.com> *On Behalf Of *ch...@go-mtc.com
>> *Sent:* Thursday, August 29, 2024 11:43 AM
>> *To:* AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group <af@af.afmug.com>
>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] fiber patch cables
>>
>>
>>
>> Index of refraction (IOR) differs from reel to reel.  If you need
>> accurate distance measurements you have to enter a precise index of
>> refraction, and the IOR can vary with distance as well.
>>
>>
>>
>> The internal timebase drifts.  Clock errors and stability cause accuracy
>> issues.
>>
>>
>>
>> Pulse width and sample interval adds precision errors.  Longer distances
>> need wider pulses so you lose precision.
>>
>> So with a loss of both precision and accuracy that is proportional to
>> distances being shot, you are never going to walk right up and dig up the
>> correct spot.
>>
>>
>>
>> Bottom line, long cables, gopher faults, you will spend lots of time
>> digging along the line to find it.
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* Josh Luthman
>>
>> *Sent:* Thursday, August 29, 2024 10:22 AM
>>
>> *To:* AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group
>>
>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] fiber patch cables
>>
>>
>>
>> 1.01x
>>
>>
>>
>> 20,300 foot cable reel is 20,500 of glass
>>
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Aug 29, 2024 at 9:01 AM <dmmoff...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> That and fiber distance is not equal to cable distance because of the
>> twist built into the buffer tubes.
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* AF <af-boun...@af.afmug.com> *On Behalf Of *ch...@go-mtc.com
>> *Sent:* Wednesday, August 28, 2024 5:05 PM
>> *To:* AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group <af@af.afmug.com>
>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] fiber patch cables
>>
>>
>>
>> Good point, with direct bury the sequentials are frequently rubbed off.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* castarritt
>>
>> *Sent:* Wednesday, August 28, 2024 2:42 PM
>>
>> *To:* AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group
>>
>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] fiber patch cables
>>
>>
>>
>> Yeah, with direct bury and no handhole for miles, you are in a tough
>> spot.  If the footage marker on the cable you dig up is still there, you
>> could go off that instead of guessing or cutting.
>>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Aug 28, 2024 at 2:58 PM <ch...@go-mtc.com> wrote:
>>
>> When you are out in the desert tracking direct bury fiber, only handholes
>> are splice points.... good luck.
>>
>> If the closest hand hole is 2 miles away from the area of the fault, good
>> luck.  You will wheel it off, read the sequential, then wheel it off again,
>> dig again.  Not find the damage.  Then you have the choice to cut and shoot
>> it again or just start exposing cable.  Flip a coin to choose which way to
>> start digging and start digging.  Have dug for hundreds of feed looking for
>> damage and sometimes it is very hard to see.  Sometimes a gopher will just
>> eat into the side of a cable a little bit.
>>
>>
>>
>> You can strip it and have someone put a visible light on it if  you are
>> not too far away for that to work.  That can tell you if you are on the CO
>> side of the fault.  There are also those bendy fiber detectors that can
>> help with that too.  Hopefully you find it close enough that you can put a
>> handhole near where  you stripped it.  Always takes two handholes or peds
>> to fix.  And LOTS of digging.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* castarritt
>>
>> *Sent:* Wednesday, August 28, 2024 1:49 PM
>>
>> *To:* AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group
>>
>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] fiber patch cables
>>
>>
>>
>> Shouldn't you be able to look at the distance to fault from the last
>> splice, look up the cable footage marker going into that splice closure (go
>> check it if you didn't document that when it was built), check footage
>> marker at closest handhole, and then wheel it off from there?
>>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Aug 28, 2024 at 2:42 PM <ch...@go-mtc.com> wrote:
>>
>> So on a 15 mile shot with a problem somewhere in the middle, you think
>> you can wheel it off and dig it up and find it?
>>
>> One shot, from the end.  Walk right to the problem?
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* Josh Luthman
>>
>> *Sent:* Wednesday, August 28, 2024 1:07 PM
>>
>> *To:* AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group
>>
>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] fiber patch cables
>>
>>
>>
>> That hasn't been my experience, but at the same time we're not 25 mile
>> shots - it's maybe 15 max.
>>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Aug 28, 2024 at 11:43 AM <ch...@go-mtc.com> wrote:
>>
>> I also use EXFOs and they will read to the meter, but if you have a fiber
>> cut out 25 miles, I will bet good money that when you dig up the spot where
>> your OTDR says the fault is, you will be off by 100 feet or more if you did
>> not do a test from the nearest splice point.  In reality it will be off by
>> thousands of feet.
>>
>>
>>
>> Best Regards,
>> Chuck McCown
>>
>> McCown Technology Corporation
>> 8401 N Commerce Dr
>> Lake Point, Utah 84074
>> 801-250-9503 Office
>> 435-830-4306 Cell
>> www.mccowntech.com
>> www.microtrench.pro
>> www.terabitnetworks.com
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* Ryan Ray
>>
>> *Sent:* Tuesday, August 27, 2024 9:58 PM
>>
>> *To:* AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group
>>
>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] fiber patch cables
>>
>>
>>
>> We use EXFO otdr's on some spans that are 160km and we can get it down to
>> the metre.
>>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Aug 27, 2024 at 7:07 PM Josh Luthman <j...@imaginenetworksllc.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> Don't you document where your splices are?  If you see your splices every
>> 33k and see it's broken 1 mile from the last splice it should be pretty
>> obvious, no?
>>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Aug 27, 2024 at 6:26 PM <ch...@go-mtc.com> wrote:
>>
>> Magical device called a fusion splicer.  Our reels were typically 33,000’
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* Josh Luthman
>>
>> *Sent:* Tuesday, August 27, 2024 3:51 PM
>>
>> *To:* AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group
>>
>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] fiber patch cables
>>
>>
>>
>> I don't see how you have a 50 mile span.  Even if you get 80k reels
>> that's 15 miles.
>>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Aug 27, 2024 at 5:19 PM <ch...@go-mtc.com> wrote:
>>
>> When you have spans up to 50-75 miles at times, you have to use longer
>> high power pulses.  There is a lot of variability in velocity of
>> propagation, earth temperature, splice slack loops, fiber twist.  1 mile
>> error over 50 miles is only 2%.  You can easily be off by several thousand
>> feet.  You can’t just go dig.  You have to go to the closest splice point
>> and test again, even then if you it show the fault 2000 feet away and you
>> dig at 2000 feet you may be off by 20 feet or more.  I have been doing this
>> for decades.  Takes lots of digging to actually find it.
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* Josh Luthman
>>
>> *Sent:* Tuesday, August 27, 2024 3:01 PM
>>
>> *To:* AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group
>>
>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] fiber patch cables
>>
>>
>>
>> A mile?!  IDK how that's possible.  Every time we turn a new splitter on
>> the sequentials and OTDR are within a few feet - we lose a couple of feet
>> in butt splices and our sequentials end up wrong.  Every new reel gets
>> tested on delivery and it's right on.
>>
>>
>>
>> When we had a broken fiber (ants) it was right on the case.  When we had
>> a broken fiber (ribbon got knicked with installation) it was between two
>> cases.
>>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Aug 27, 2024 at 3:48 PM <ch...@go-mtc.com> wrote:
>>
>> Wow, sometimes looking for gopher damager over 20 miles I have been off a
>> mile.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* Josh Luthman
>>
>> *Sent:* Tuesday, August 27, 2024 1:30 PM
>>
>> *To:* AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group
>>
>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] fiber patch cables
>>
>>
>>
>> So far every time we've used the OTDR it's been accurate within 1 foot.
>>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Aug 27, 2024 at 12:55 PM Trey Scarborough <t...@3dsc.co> wrote:
>>
>> The only thing you have to worry about with shorter cables is the
>> reflection. In some instances with dirty connector at just the right
>> connector you can get reflection back in to the transmitter that can cause
>> errors, the tx to shut down or premature failure. This is very uncommon
>> with LR 10G and less optics and can be prevented from making sure you have
>> clean connectors. Check the RX and TX levels and make sure you don't have
>> excessive loss. With 100G its a little different story due to the combined
>> power of multiple channels, but still can be prevented by cleaning
>> connectors, but in some instances Ive had to use attenuation when mixing
>> different vendor optics.
>>
>> The using no launch on an OTDR most automatically calibrating OTDRs will
>> work without one. Your results can be off though. Most of the lower cost
>> ones are also lower powered and have less of an RX sensitivity so they
>> don't suffer as much from the reflections interfering when testing. I can
>> test all day long with my little otdrs without one, but my long range 200k+
>> units I have to have a minimum of a 1k spool on it or you see ghosts. They
>> will show up as repeating events at even intervals. Not something you will
>> see on shorter runs either.
>>
>>
>>
>> On 8/26/24 4:31 PM, Ken Hohhof wrote:
>>
>> I should note that apparently I used to do this with direct attach cables
>> (DAC) but I think that was a pain, one more thing to stock and to bring
>> with for projects.  Whereas I’d always have boxes full of SFPs and fiber
>> patch cords.
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* AF mailto:af-boun...@af.afmug.com *On Behalf Of *Josh Luthman
>> *Sent:* Monday, August 26, 2024 4:20 PM
>> *To:* AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group mailto:af@af.afmug.com
>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] fiber patch cables
>>
>>
>>
>> People say you need a launch cable but our cheap china OTDRs have no
>> issues seeing the connector at the end of the patch cable and stuff
>> beyond.  I bought a big launch cable back in the day and never use it
>> anymore.
>>
>>
>>
>> Might be different with AE?
>>
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Aug 26, 2024 at 5:16 PM <ch...@go-mtc.com> wrote:
>>
>> Only minimum length I know of is the OTDR dead zone.  If that is a
>> problem you purposely lengthen the cable with a launch cable.
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* Josh Luthman
>>
>> *Sent:* Monday, August 26, 2024 1:59 PM
>>
>> *To:* AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group
>>
>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] fiber patch cables
>>
>>
>>
>> Reddit is wrong.  Gasp.
>>
>>
>>
>> Connectors are loss, there is more loss in either one of the connectors
>> than there is the single mode glass.
>>
>>
>>
>> Between a switch/router in a rack what I see all the time is long (like
>> 5/10/15 feet) cables and then put the slack in a loop along the posts.
>>
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Aug 26, 2024 at 1:19 PM TJ Trout <t...@voltbb.com> wrote:
>>
>> Patchbox makes some great products, their fiber system is pretty slick
>> but expensive.
>>
>>
>>
>> Cable length is irrelevant it's optical budget / Rx signal strength.
>> Normally on 2-20k LR optics you are ok with any length cable, 40km+ needs a
>> pad on short spans. (Attenuator)
>>
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Aug 26, 2024, 8:29 AM Ken Hohhof <khoh...@kwom.com> wrote:
>>
>> Is there a minimum length for a single mode fiber patch cable?
>>
>>
>>
>> I have been using 1 meter cables and they are almost always too long, I’m
>> talking about going between routers and switches in a rack, stuff like
>> that.  I see that FS sells 0.5 meter cables, but I saw somewhere like maybe
>> on Reddit someone claiming there was a minimum length.  Given SM fiber and
>> LR optics, I don’t see how 0.5 or 1.0 meter would be different they are
>> both essentially zero length.
>>
>>
>>
>> Probably there’s some kind of cable tray or cable management solution I
>> could be using but I’ve never liked such things.
>>
>> --
>> AF mailing list
>> AF@af.afmug.com
>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>>
>> --
>> AF mailing list
>> AF@af.afmug.com
>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>>
>> ------------------------------
>>
>> --
>> AF mailing list
>> AF@af.afmug.com
>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>>
>> --
>> AF mailing list
>> AF@af.afmug.com
>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> AF mailing list
>> AF@af.afmug.com
>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>>
>> ------------------------------
>>
>> --
>> AF mailing list
>> AF@af.afmug.com
>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>>
>> --
>> AF mailing list
>> AF@af.afmug.com
>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>>
>> ------------------------------
>>
>> --
>> AF mailing list
>> AF@af.afmug.com
>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>>
>> --
>> AF mailing list
>> AF@af.afmug.com
>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>>
>> ------------------------------
>>
>> --
>> AF mailing list
>> AF@af.afmug.com
>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>>
>> --
>> AF mailing list
>> AF@af.afmug.com
>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>>
>> --
>> AF mailing list
>> AF@af.afmug.com
>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>>
>> ------------------------------
>>
>> --
>> AF mailing list
>> AF@af.afmug.com
>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>>
>> --
>> AF mailing list
>> AF@af.afmug.com
>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>>
>> ------------------------------
>>
>> --
>> AF mailing list
>> AF@af.afmug.com
>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>>
>> --
>> AF mailing list
>> AF@af.afmug.com
>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>>
>> ------------------------------
>>
>> --
>> AF mailing list
>> AF@af.afmug.com
>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>>
>> --
>> AF mailing list
>> AF@af.afmug.com
>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>>
>> ------------------------------
>>
>> --
>> AF mailing list
>> AF@af.afmug.com
>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>>
>> --
>> AF mailing list
>> AF@af.afmug.com
>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>>
>> ------------------------------
>>
>> --
>> AF mailing list
>> AF@af.afmug.com
>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>> ------------------------------
>>
>> --
>> AF mailing list
>> AF@af.afmug.com
>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>>
>> --
>> AF mailing list
>> AF@af.afmug.com
>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>>
>> ------------------------------
>>
>> --
>> AF mailing list
>> AF@af.afmug.com
>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>>
>> --
>> AF mailing list
>> AF@af.afmug.com
>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>>
>> --
>> AF mailing list
>> AF@af.afmug.com
>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>>
> ------------------------------
> --
> AF mailing list
> AF@af.afmug.com
> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>
> --
> AF mailing list
> AF@af.afmug.com
> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>
-- 
AF mailing list
AF@af.afmug.com
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com

Reply via email to