Was the Hubbell Telescope screwup related to metric vs 'merican?---- Original 
Message ----From: "Shayne Lebrun" Sent: 8/30/2024 9:55:43 AMTo: "AnimalFarm 
Microwave Users Group" Subject: Re: [AFMUG] fiber patch cables




The browser-tab title goes here




Say, did you know that the Apollo Guidance Computer, from the first iteration 
in 1958, did all of it?s internal calculations in metric, then converted to 
imperial for display to
 the astronauts?
?
So yes, America went to the Moon on metric.
?

Shayne Lebrun ?
Senior Systems Analyst

Support:
supp...@lakelandnetworks.com?
 705-640-0556 | TF: 844-444-4249?
Direct:
sleb...@lakelandnetworks.com ?705-646-1846 x583 |
?https://www.lakelandnetworks.com/faqs/
Lakeland Networks

?


From: AF <af-boun...@af.afmug.com>
On Behalf Of Josh Luthman
Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2024 9:12 AM
To: AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group <af@af.afmug.com>
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] fiber patch cables


?
' 


?

EXTERNAL Email Disclaimer

CAUTION: This email originated from outside the organization. Exercise caution 
when clicking on links or opening attachments even if you
 recognize the sender. 





Totally missed that last part XD

There are two kinds of countries:? those that use the metric system and those 
that have been the moon.

?


On Wed, Aug 28, 2024 at 8:52?AM Ken Hohhof <khoh...@kwom.com> wrote:


Because he used metric, or because he spelled it metre?

---- Original Message ----
From: "Josh Luthman" 
Sent: 8/28/2024 7:40:18 AM
To: "AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group" 
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] fiber patch cables

OK Euro guy...let the American's get the job done.

?


On Tue, Aug 27, 2024 at 11:59?PM Ryan Ray <ryan...@gmail.com> wrote:



We use EXFO otdr's?on?some spans that are 160km and we can get it down to the 
metre.?

?


On Tue, Aug 27, 2024 at 7:07?PM Josh Luthman <j...@imaginenetworksllc.com> 
wrote:



Don't you document where your splices are?? If you see your splices every 33k 
and see it's broken 1 mile from the last splice it should be pretty obvious, no?

?


On Tue, Aug 27, 2024 at 6:26?PM <ch...@go-mtc.com> wrote:






Magical device called a fusion splicer.? Our reels were typically 33,000?


?




?



From: Josh Luthman



Sent: Tuesday, August 27, 2024 3:51 PM


To: AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group



Subject: Re: [AFMUG] fiber patch cables




?




I don't see how you have a 50 mile span.? Even if you get 80k reels that's 15 
miles.


?



On Tue, Aug 27, 2024 at 5:19?PM <ch...@go-mtc.com> wrote:






When you have spans up to 50-75 miles at times, you have to use longer high 
power pulses.? There is a lot of variability in velocity of propagation, earth 
temperature,
 splice slack loops, fiber twist.? 1 mile error over 50 miles is only 2%.? You 
can easily be off by several thousand feet.? You can?t just go dig.? You have 
to go to the closest splice point and test again, even then if you it show the 
fault 2000 feet away
 and you dig at 2000 feet you may be off by 20 feet or more.? I have been doing 
this for decades.? Takes lots of digging to actually find it.?





?



From: Josh Luthman



Sent: Tuesday, August 27, 2024 3:01 PM


To: AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group



Subject: Re: [AFMUG] fiber patch cables




?




A mile?!? IDK how that's possible.? Every time we turn a new splitter on the 
sequentials and OTDR are within a few feet - we lose a couple of feet in butt 
splices and our sequentials
 end up wrong.? Every new reel gets tested on delivery and it's right on. 

?


When we had a broken fiber (ants) it was right on the case.? When we had a 
broken fiber (ribbon got knicked with installation) it was between two cases.



?



On Tue, Aug 27, 2024 at 3:48?PM <ch...@go-mtc.com> wrote:






Wow, sometimes looking for gopher damager over 20 miles I have been off a mile.?



?


?




?



From: Josh Luthman



Sent: Tuesday, August 27, 2024 1:30 PM


To: AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group



Subject: Re: [AFMUG] fiber patch cables




?




So far every time we've used the OTDR it's been accurate within 1 foot.


?



On Tue, Aug 27, 2024 at 12:55?PM Trey Scarborough <t...@3dsc.co> wrote:



The only thing you have to worry about with shorter cables is the reflection. 
In some instances with dirty connector at just the right connector you can get 
reflection back in to the transmitter
 that can cause errors, the tx to shut down or premature failure. This is very 
uncommon with LR 10G and less optics and can be prevented from making sure you 
have clean connectors. Check the RX and TX levels and make sure you don't have 
excessive loss. With
 100G its a little different story due to the combined power of multiple 
channels, but still can be prevented by cleaning connectors, but in some 
instances Ive had to use attenuation when mixing different vendor optics.
The using no launch on an OTDR most automatically calibrating OTDRs will work 
without one. Your results can be off though. Most of the lower cost ones are 
also lower powered and have less of an RX
 sensitivity so they don't suffer as much from the reflections interfering when 
testing. I can test all day long with my little otdrs without one, but my long 
range 200k+ units I have to have a minimum of a 1k spool on it or you see 
ghosts. They will show up
 as repeating events at even intervals. Not something you will see on shorter 
runs either.
?

On 8/26/24 4:31 PM, Ken Hohhof wrote:



I should note that apparently I used to do this with direct attach cables (DAC) 
but I think that was
 a pain, one more thing to stock and to bring with for projects.? Whereas I?d 
always have boxes full of SFPs and fiber patch cords.
?

From: AF
mailto:af-boun...@af.afmug.com On Behalf Of
Josh Luthman
Sent: Monday, August 26, 2024 4:20 PM
To: AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group mailto:af@af.afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] fiber patch cables

?

People say you need a launch cable but our cheap china OTDRs have no issues 
seeing the connector at the end of the patch
 cable and stuff beyond.? I bought a big launch cable back in the day and never 
use it anymore.

?


Might be different with AE?


?


On Mon, Aug 26, 2024 at 5:16?PM
 <ch...@go-mtc.com> wrote:






Only minimum length I know of is the OTDR dead zone.? If that is a problem you 
purposely lengthen the cable
 with a launch cable.? 




?




From: Josh Luthman




Sent: Monday, August 26, 2024 1:59 PM



To: AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group




Subject: Re: [AFMUG] fiber patch cables




?




Reddit is wrong.? Gasp.


?


Connectors are loss, there is more loss in either one of the connectors than 
there is the single mode glass.


?


Between a switch/router in a rack what I see all the time is long (like 5/10/15 
feet) cables and then put the slack in
 a loop along the posts.



?



On Mon, Aug 26, 2024 at 1:19?PM TJ Trout <t...@voltbb.com> wrote:



Patchbox makes some great products, their fiber system is pretty slick but 
expensive.?


?


Cable length is irrelevant it's optical budget / Rx signal strength. Normally 
on 2-20k LR optics you are ok with any length
 cable, 40km+ needs a pad on short spans. (Attenuator)



?



On Mon, Aug 26, 2024, 8:29?AM Ken Hohhof <khoh...@kwom.com> wrote:




Is there a minimum length for a single mode fiber patch cable?
?
I have been using 1 meter cables and they are almost always too long, I?m 
talking about going between routers and switches
 in a rack, stuff like that.? I see that FS sells 0.5 meter cables, but I saw 
somewhere like maybe on Reddit someone claiming there was a minimum length.? 
Given SM fiber and LR optics, I don?t see how 0.5 or 1.0 meter would be 
different they are both essentially
 zero length.
?
Probably there?s some kind of cable tray or cable management solution I could 
be using but I?ve never liked such things.



--

AF mailing list
AF@af.afmug.com
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com


--

AF mailing list
AF@af.afmug.com
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com





--

AF mailing list
AF@af.afmug.com
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com




--

AF mailing list
AF@af.afmug.com
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com








--

AF mailing list
AF@af.afmug.com
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com





--

AF mailing list
AF@af.afmug.com
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com




--

AF mailing list
AF@af.afmug.com
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com





--

AF mailing list
AF@af.afmug.com
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com




--

AF mailing list
AF@af.afmug.com
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com





--

AF mailing list
AF@af.afmug.com
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com




-- 
AF mailing list
AF@af.afmug.com
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com


-- 
AF mailing list
AF@af.afmug.com
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com


-- 
AF mailing list
AF@af.afmug.com
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com


-- 
AF mailing list
AF@af.afmug.com
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com






-- 
AF mailing list
AF@af.afmug.com
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com

Reply via email to