Zerotier
[cid:asset9_6087ff1a-e4b2-42dc-8e37-828fd52a1737.png]<https://aeronetpr.com> Gino Villarini Founder / President @GVillarini 787.273.4143 | [cid:asset7_7460a97c-d1f8-4aa7-a1db-f2a242ae25e4.png]<https://www.inc.com/profile/aeronet> [cid:asset4_90de6cc3-6a6e-42ea-8ee1-7c1c75ed1fba.png] <https://www.facebook.com/aeronetpr> [cid:asset1_8e2690da-eab4-4f70-bc52-aea656beff88.png] <https://www.instagram.com/aeronetpr/> [cid:asset2_348ee3e1-d43a-4c17-91c2-6c95ac766846.png] <https://www.linkedin.com/company/aeronet-broadband-corp> [cid:asset3_4a7ab080-a45e-48d4-a88f-2a02557e530f.png] <https://twitter.com/aeronetpr> [cid:asset5_cb8f047a-701e-4e36-9570-4e6e92f8689c.png] <https://www.youtube.com/user/AeroNetPR> <https://wa.me/17872734143> [cid:asset6@2x_f661ca1c-dcf6-4863-943b-1b6d991f4304.png] <https://wa.me/17872734144> Metro Office Park #18 Suite 304 Guaynabo, PR 00968 <https://homefi.pr><https://homefi.pr>[cid:homefi2022emailsignaturebanner-80_d431b411-e0f5-4655-a8e5-bbef633515b1.jpg]<https://homefi.pr><https://homefi.pr> <https://homefi.pr> From: AF <af-boun...@af.afmug.com> on behalf of Josh Luthman <j...@imaginenetworksllc.com> Date: Wednesday, April 13, 2022 at 12:31 PM To: AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group <af@af.afmug.com> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Reaching a Mikrotik behind NAT I'm using L2TP myself. This is for AT&T LTE devices. Works pretty well as a protocol, even on the complete garbage service that AT&T provides. There's also a company that offers a solution for this: https://www.remotewinbox.com/auth/blog/Home<https://www.remotewinbox.com/auth/blog/Home> On Wed, Apr 13, 2022 at 11:10 AM Trey Scarborough <t...@3dsc.co<mailto:t...@3dsc.co>> wrote: in my experience the best reliable way is to use sstp as it uses normal http protocol and can traverse most NAT/firewall instances. I have had issues with the others wiregaurd is nice , but if all you need is access to remotely manage and monitor equipment and there is not much bandwidth then the simplicity of sstp has been easier in most instances for me. On 4/11/22 10:11 AM, Nate Burke wrote: > Before I spend half a day lab'ing the best way, advice on the best way > to access/monitor a Mikrotik behind a NAT Connection? I do not have > the ability to do any port forwarding. It's possible it may also be > behind more than 1 NAT layer. > > I'd also like a couple of the devices behind the Mikrotik to be > remotely accessible as well (UPS), but a majority of the devices will > go straight out the NAT connection and don't need to tunnel. > > Looks like PPTP/L2TP or Wireguard? Is one easier/more reliable? > -- AF mailing list AF@af.afmug.com<mailto:AF@af.afmug.com> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com<http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com>
-- AF mailing list AF@af.afmug.com http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
