I'm using L2TP myself. This is for AT&T LTE devices. Works pretty well as a protocol, even on the complete garbage service that AT&T provides.
There's also a company that offers a solution for this: https://www.remotewinbox.com/auth/blog/Home On Wed, Apr 13, 2022 at 11:10 AM Trey Scarborough <t...@3dsc.co> wrote: > in my experience the best reliable way is to use sstp as it uses normal > http protocol and can traverse most NAT/firewall instances. I have had > issues with the others wiregaurd is nice , but if all you need is access > to remotely manage and monitor equipment and there is not much bandwidth > then the simplicity of sstp has been easier in most instances for me. > > On 4/11/22 10:11 AM, Nate Burke wrote: > > Before I spend half a day lab'ing the best way, advice on the best way > > to access/monitor a Mikrotik behind a NAT Connection? I do not have > > the ability to do any port forwarding. It's possible it may also be > > behind more than 1 NAT layer. > > > > I'd also like a couple of the devices behind the Mikrotik to be > > remotely accessible as well (UPS), but a majority of the devices will > > go straight out the NAT connection and don't need to tunnel. > > > > Looks like PPTP/L2TP or Wireguard? Is one easier/more reliable? > > > > -- > AF mailing list > AF@af.afmug.com > http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com >
-- AF mailing list AF@af.afmug.com http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
