in my experience the best reliable way is to use sstp as it uses normal
http protocol and can traverse most NAT/firewall instances. I have had
issues with the others wiregaurd is nice , but if all you need is access
to remotely manage and monitor equipment and there is not much bandwidth
then the simplicity of sstp has been easier in most instances for me.
On 4/11/22 10:11 AM, Nate Burke wrote:
Before I spend half a day lab'ing the best way, advice on the best way
to access/monitor a Mikrotik behind a NAT Connection? I do not have
the ability to do any port forwarding. It's possible it may also be
behind more than 1 NAT layer.
I'd also like a couple of the devices behind the Mikrotik to be
remotely accessible as well (UPS), but a majority of the devices will
go straight out the NAT connection and don't need to tunnel.
Looks like PPTP/L2TP or Wireguard? Is one easier/more reliable?
--
AF mailing list
AF@af.afmug.com
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
