Even though it would put us out of biz, fiber is the need of the
future. Every thing else is stop gap, for fixed locations.
On 3/5/21 7:20 AM, Mathew Howard wrote:
You would think that since they bothered coming up with excuses why
the current standard isn't good enough, they could at least come up
with a number based on their imagined need, instead of just coming up
with a random number with no basis in anything other than "100/100
sounds good".
It's not that hard... according to them, Zoom needs 3.8mbps upload per
1080p stream (and obviously everybody in the house absolutely needs to
be using 1080p), so lets say a lot of households are running 5
simultaneous Zoom sessions (which I'm guessing is actually fairly
rare)... that's 19Mbps, so throw in some overhead and make it, say
25Mbps. That's realistically going to be way more upload bandwidth
than the vast majority of people ever need, so why exactly do we need
to make the standard four times that?
I guess it's one way to only fund fiber, which probably isn't a
terrible idea if we're going to insist on throwing tax payer money
away on such projects.
On Thu, Mar 4, 2021 at 10:21 PM Steve Jones <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
As long as they're tossing arbitrary numbers for need out there
without any fact based justification I think we should get carte
blanche to do as we please to make it happen. No need for ROW, we
will take the O out of OTARD and give it a big fat REeeee. Dont
want us running cable through your living room to your neighbors
house? Move. That 300 year old oak is in the way? Federal money
for husqvarna solutions. 1 watt per mhz? F that, 1.12 gigawatt at
the cpe. We will burn those obstructions out of the way, make it
disappear like micheal j fox in a Polaroid.
On Thu, Mar 4, 2021, 9:29 PM Ryan Ray <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Just create another CBRS database and let's get a huge swath
of spectrum dedicated to PTMP without huge fees for rural
areas. Lots of places where we could service 700-800 people if
only more spectrum was available and it wouldn't impact anyone
else in that band. If it does? Shut it off. Spectrum feels
like such a wasted resource. We could be doing so much more
with it, we understand how it propagates and software can now
handle that on the fly in order to allocate to as many people
as possible. I honestly think a fluid and dynamic database
like this is the future of wireless.
On Thu, Mar 4, 2021 at 5:45 PM Steve Jones
<[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
wrote:
https://www.theverge.com/2021/3/4/22312065/fcc-highspeed-broadband-service-ajit-pai-bennet-angus-king-rob-portman
<https://www.theverge.com/2021/3/4/22312065/fcc-highspeed-broadband-service-ajit-pai-bennet-angus-king-rob-portman>
Meth and kickbacks. They need to just free up
500mhz-120ghz for just WISP use. Then each wisp can have a
ton of spectrum to get that porn to every device
--
AF mailing list
[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
<http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com>
--
AF mailing list
[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
<http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com>
--
AF mailing list
[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
<http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com>
--
AF mailing list
[email protected]
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
