Re: [AFMUG] OT Royalty deal

chuck Thu, 08 Oct 2020 00:10:24 -0700

Soylent Green.  

From: Steve Jones 
Sent: Wednesday, October 7, 2020 11:42 PM
To: AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group 
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] OT Royalty deal

So I've been giving it thought. If you were in a survival scenario, plane
crash, insurrection, aliens, whatever and had to resort to cannibalism, if it
were your job to be the hunter. Would you tell your people you were feeding
them other people? Or just tell them you captured a cat or something and serve
it prepared.
I'm really torn on this one. It's wrong to not tell them, but if you did it
could cause strife. Keeping it a secret nobody has the moral issue to contend
with but you'll run out of people meat sooner. If you tell them, some will
refuse, which extends your meat stores.
That presents a new issue, those who dont partake are going to ultimately
starve to death, by that point there wont be much food left on them, it would
almost be irresponsible to let all that protein go to waste and you might need
to harvest them right then and there.

I wonder if an hoa can put in a cannibalism clause in the event of major issues
where food will become an issue.

On Wed, Oct 7, 2020, 5:32 PM castarritt <castarr...@gmail.com> wrote:

Moderate Lent

On Wed, Oct 7, 2020 at 10:14 AM Brian Webster <i...@wirelessmapping.com>
wrote:

Isn’t it Lent?

Thank you,

Brian Webster

www.wirelessmapping.com

From: AF [mailto:af-boun...@af.afmug.com] On Behalf Of ch...@wbmfg.com
Sent: Wednesday, October 7, 2020 11:00 AM
To: AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] OT Royalty deal

Well, pedophilia amongst children is probably OK.

Moderate shootings with bean bag projectiles can be OK.

Moderate cannibalism is OK when your airplane crashes in the Andes or you
get snowed in by Truckee.

Moderate fascism is totally OK in Russia it appears.

I like moderate black lives.

From: Bill Prince

Sent: Wednesday, October 7, 2020 8:49 AM

To: af@af.afmug.com

Subject: Re: [AFMUG] OT Royalty deal

Only moderate fascism.

Only moderate pedophilia.

Only moderate cannibalism.

Only moderate shooting.

Only moderate black lives.

bp<part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com>On 10/7/2020 6:54 AM, Chuck McCown wrote:

I choose moderation in all things.

Sent from my iPhone

On Oct 7, 2020, at 7:51 AM, Adam Moffett mailto:dmmoff...@gmail.com wrote:

The medal hanging in the center of Star Trek Q's chest appears to be a
sheep. Oddly relevant. The shepherd known as QAnon convinces his sheep that
they're the enlightened ones and the non-believers are the real sheep.

I know some of you are more worried about the left wing radicals who
need to battle fascism and white supremacists which actually exist in the US
only in scattered hundreds with no political or cultural relevance. The right
wing ones frighten the hell out of me with their need to battle the pedophile
cannibals who are completely imaginary. A lot of people on both of these wings
imagine that the silent majority secretly supports them. I think the silent
majority is silent for the same reason you silently ignore a raving street
preacher. Meanwhile a lot of politicians have noted that the loud and crazy
people are more motivated to vote.

Actual policy discussion becomes mired in the craziness. "Oh you like
free markets? Must be a white supremacist."

"Oh you're concerned the American police resort to violence more often
than those in other countries. You're a pawn of the pedophile cannibal cabal."
Interesting times.

On 10/6/2020 6:26 PM, Mike Hammett wrote:

<qheader.jpg>

-----
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions

Midwest Internet Exchange

The Brothers WISP

----------------------------------------------------------------------

From: "Bill Prince" mailto:part15...@gmail.com
To: af@af.afmug.com
Sent: Tuesday, October 6, 2020 5:23:18 PM
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] OT Royalty deal

Q is the supposed "leader" of Qanon. Personally, I think there is
probably more than one Q, and they may or may not coordinate their message(s).
I think they could be more effective if they weren't so out and out bonkers.
Eat babies? really?

bp<part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com>On 10/6/2020 10:58 AM, Steve Jones wrote:

is that a real conspiracy?

My wife had a friend over the other day, first time I ever met a
real Q believer. weird shit. is Q not the same as Qanon? cause Qanon I always
thought was just some guy that posted vague stuff and was supposedly in the
administration. Q people think the rich eat babies and some lady who just had a
miscarriage, cristy tegan or something, uses the code pizza, for little girls
and always instagrams about pizza. weird shit

I think HOAs operate on different rules, since its a "voluntary"
entry into them. Ive never looked too deep into it cause id never be in one, id
put an air hose up my back first. but the contracts must give up a great deal
of private property rights including waiving otard stuff

On Tue, Oct 6, 2020 at 9:23 AM Robert <i...@avantwireless.com>
wrote:

Google uses low frequency brain stimulation.. Whenever you use
their browser and the volume isn't turned off.

On 10/6/20 7:15 AM, Adam Moffett wrote:

Messaging is king of all I suppose.

If you were Google, people would believe that you magically
give it away for free. Since you're not Google they'll assume some kind of
robbery or graft. I don't know how Google pulls off that kind of public
relations coup.

On 10/6/2020 10:06 AM, Chuck McCown via AF wrote:

But it is free! Comes with HOA dues. Such a deal.

Sent from my iPhone

On Oct 6, 2020, at 7:58 AM, Adam Moffett
mailto:dmmoff...@gmail.com wrote:

If I was in charge of laws, they wouldn't be so legalistic.

You don't have exclusivity per se, but in de facto nobody
will buy anything else when they're already forced to pay you whether they like
it or not. They'd have to actively hate you before they'll even consider
something else. You'd have to steal their birthdays before they consider
another option, and you'd have to violate their daughters before they're
willing to pay what the installation of the other option will actually cost.

.....that doesn't make it a bad deal for you, of course.
Competitors will cry foul because you can make money and they can't, but that
doesn't mean they wouldn't do the same thing if they could.

On 10/5/2020 8:05 PM, ch...@wbmfg.com wrote:

We don’t have exclusivity, we just have a service
included in HOA fees. They can have any service provider they want.

But the service provider will have to do an overbuild
into a saturated area. I would bet they will not do it.

From: Mark Radabaugh

Sent: Monday, October 5, 2020 5:52 PM

To: AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group

Subject: Re: [AFMUG] OT Royalty deal

https://www.keglerbrown.com/publications/mdus-vs-the-fcc-exclusivity-service-agreements-with-cable-and-internet-providers/

https://www.nexttv.com/news/fcc-bans-exclusive-mdu-deals-296566

FCC Bans Exclusivity Contracts — HOA Law Blog — February
...www.hoalawblog.com › fcc_bans_exclusivity_contracts

Pay your money and take your chances

Mark

On Oct 5, 2020, at 4:52 PM, Chuck McCown
<ch...@wbmfg.com> wrote:

Lots of companies doing these deals. MDU,
subdivisions. What would be illegal about it? The homeowners are free to go
after any service they want, but they are locked into my service. This has
been litigated at the CATV level years ago and was found legal.

On Mon, Oct 5, 2020 at 2:28 PM Mark Radabaugh
<m...@amplex.net> wrote:

I think you are going to find that arrangement is
highly illegal from an FCC standpoint. When the deal gets blown out by the
next company that sues you and the HOA over it, is it going to be worth your
time and investment?

Mark

On Oct 5, 2020, at 4:20 PM, ch...@wbmfg.com wrote:

I am getting some traction with developers for my
fiber. They want me to come in, they will put the subscription to my service
as part of the HOA fees. They will not let others in the ditch. All for 10%
of the gross. So I get 100% take rate. I am not unhappy with the deal. But I
am wondering about agreeing to a perpetual royalty. Anyone else done one of
these deals?

--
AF mailing list
AF@af.afmug.com
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com

----------------------------------------------------------

--
AF mailing list
AF@af.afmug.com
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com

----------------------------------------------------------------------------

--
AF mailing list
AF@af.afmug.com
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
AF mailing list
AF@af.afmug.com
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com

-- 
AF mailing list
AF@af.afmug.com
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com

Re: [AFMUG] OT Royalty deal

Reply via email to