I choose moderation in all things.
Sent from my iPhone
> On Oct 7, 2020, at 7:51 AM, Adam Moffett <dmmoff...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> The medal hanging in the center of Star Trek Q's chest appears to be a sheep.
> Oddly relevant. The shepherd known as QAnon convinces his sheep that
> they're the enlightened ones and the non-believers are the real sheep.
>
>
>
> I know some of you are more worried about the left wing radicals who need to
> battle fascism and white supremacists which actually exist in the US only in
> scattered hundreds with no political or cultural relevance. The right wing
> ones frighten the hell out of me with their need to battle the pedophile
> cannibals who are completely imaginary. A lot of people on both of these
> wings imagine that the silent majority secretly supports them. I think the
> silent majority is silent for the same reason you silently ignore a raving
> street preacher. Meanwhile a lot of politicians have noted that the loud and
> crazy people are more motivated to vote.
>
>
>
> Actual policy discussion becomes mired in the craziness. "Oh you like free
> markets? Must be a white supremacist."
>
> "Oh you're concerned the American police resort to violence more often than
> those in other countries. You're a pawn of the pedophile cannibal cabal."
> Interesting times.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On 10/6/2020 6:26 PM, Mike Hammett wrote:
>> <qheader.jpg>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> -----
>> Mike Hammett
>> Intelligent Computing Solutions
>>
>> Midwest Internet Exchange
>>
>> The Brothers WISP
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> From: "Bill Prince" <part15...@gmail.com>
>> To: af@af.afmug.com
>> Sent: Tuesday, October 6, 2020 5:23:18 PM
>> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] OT Royalty deal
>>
>> Q is the supposed "leader" of Qanon. Personally, I think there is probably
>> more than one Q, and they may or may not coordinate their message(s). I
>> think they could be more effective if they weren't so out and out bonkers.
>> Eat babies? really?
>>
>>
>>
>> bp
>> <part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com>
>> On 10/6/2020 10:58 AM, Steve Jones wrote:
>> is that a real conspiracy?
>>
>> My wife had a friend over the other day, first time I ever met a real Q
>> believer. weird shit. is Q not the same as Qanon? cause Qanon I always
>> thought was just some guy that posted vague stuff and was supposedly in the
>> administration. Q people think the rich eat babies and some lady who just
>> had a miscarriage, cristy tegan or something, uses the code pizza, for
>> little girls and always instagrams about pizza. weird shit
>>
>> I think HOAs operate on different rules, since its a "voluntary" entry into
>> them. Ive never looked too deep into it cause id never be in one, id put an
>> air hose up my back first. but the contracts must give up a great deal of
>> private property rights including waiving otard stuff
>>
>> On Tue, Oct 6, 2020 at 9:23 AM Robert <i...@avantwireless.com> wrote:
>>> Google uses low frequency brain stimulation.. Whenever you use their
>>> browser and the volume isn't turned off.
>>>
>>> On 10/6/20 7:15 AM, Adam Moffett wrote:
>>> Messaging is king of all I suppose.
>>>
>>> If you were Google, people would believe that you magically give it away
>>> for free. Since you're not Google they'll assume some kind of robbery or
>>> graft. I don't know how Google pulls off that kind of public relations
>>> coup.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 10/6/2020 10:06 AM, Chuck McCown via AF wrote:
>>> But it is free! Comes with HOA dues. Such a deal.
>>>
>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>>
>>> On Oct 6, 2020, at 7:58 AM, Adam Moffett <dmmoff...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> If I was in charge of laws, they wouldn't be so legalistic.
>>>
>>> You don't have exclusivity per se, but in de facto nobody will buy anything
>>> else when they're already forced to pay you whether they like it or not.
>>> They'd have to actively hate you before they'll even consider something
>>> else. You'd have to steal their birthdays before they consider another
>>> option, and you'd have to violate their daughters before they're willing to
>>> pay what the installation of the other option will actually cost.
>>>
>>> .....that doesn't make it a bad deal for you, of course. Competitors will
>>> cry foul because you can make money and they can't, but that doesn't mean
>>> they wouldn't do the same thing if they could.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 10/5/2020 8:05 PM, ch...@wbmfg.com wrote:
>>>
>>> We don’t have exclusivity, we just have a service included in HOA fees.
>>> They can have any service provider they want.
>>> But the service provider will have to do an overbuild into a saturated
>>> area. I would bet they will not do it.
>>>
>>> From: Mark Radabaugh
>>> Sent: Monday, October 5, 2020 5:52 PM
>>> To: AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group
>>> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] OT Royalty deal
>>>
>>> https://www.keglerbrown.com/publications/mdus-vs-the-fcc-exclusivity-service-agreements-with-cable-and-internet-providers/
>>> https://www.nexttv.com/news/fcc-bans-exclusive-mdu-deals-296566
>>> FCC Bans Exclusivity Contracts — HOA Law Blog — February
>>> ...www.hoalawblog.com › fcc_bans_exclusivity_contracts
>>>
>>> Pay your money and take your chances
>>>
>>> Mark
>>>
>>> On Oct 5, 2020, at 4:52 PM, Chuck McCown <ch...@wbmfg.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Lots of companies doing these deals. MDU, subdivisions. What would be
>>> illegal about it? The homeowners are free to go after any service they
>>> want, but they are locked into my service. This has been litigated at the
>>> CATV level years ago and was found legal.
>>>
>>> On Mon, Oct 5, 2020 at 2:28 PM Mark Radabaugh <m...@amplex.net> wrote:
>>>> I think you are going to find that arrangement is highly illegal from an
>>>> FCC standpoint. When the deal gets blown out by the next company that
>>>> sues you and the HOA over it, is it going to be worth your time and
>>>> investment?
>>>>
>>>> Mark
>>>>
>>>> On Oct 5, 2020, at 4:20 PM, ch...@wbmfg.com wrote:
>>>>
>>>> I am getting some traction with developers for my fiber. They want me to
>>>> come in, they will put the subscription to my service as part of the HOA
>>>> fees. They will not let others in the ditch. All for 10% of the gross.
>>>> So I get 100% take rate. I am not unhappy with the deal. But I am
>>>> wondering about agreeing to a perpetual royalty. Anyone else done one of
>>>> these deals?
>>>> --
>>>> AF mailing list
>>>> AF@af.afmug.com
>>>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> AF mailing list
>>>> AF@af.afmug.com
>>>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>>> --
>>> AF mailing list
>>> AF@af.afmug.com
>>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>>>
>>> --
>>> AF mailing list
>>> AF@af.afmug.com
>>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> AF mailing list
>>> AF@af.afmug.com
>>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> AF mailing list
>>> AF@af.afmug.com
>>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>>
>>
>> --
>> AF mailing list
>> AF@af.afmug.com
>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>>
>>
>>
> --
> AF mailing list
> AF@af.afmug.com
> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
--
AF mailing list
AF@af.afmug.com
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
