I haven't had any specific problems with Zoom....but looking at a
situation for helping a local school district.
I thought it might be useful to say that I *could* prioritize Zoom.
Whether or not I would really need to is less important than whether I
can give them warm and fuzzy feelings about it.
On 9/2/2020 2:41 PM, Steve Jones wrote:
we have one house with 5 remote learners, other than when theres a
file getting uploaded, even on a small connection the mother ive been
communicating with has said its been working flawlessly. is zoom
related to skype in its back end?
On Wed, Sep 2, 2020 at 1:33 PM Adam Moffett <dmmoff...@gmail.com
<mailto:dmmoff...@gmail.com>> wrote:
Porn isn't zoom.....at least not yet. Maybe that's the next new
normal.
Netflix also isn't zoom.
So if 5 kids using Zoom on a 3mbps connection is the problem then
what you say is true. If it's 1 or 2 kids competing with other
households' Netflix and Chill then QoS can address that.
On 9/2/2020 2:19 PM, Ken Hohhof wrote:
If everything is Zoom, and you prioritize Zoom, you prioritize
everything. It’s like everyone is a winner, but if nobody loses,
what’s the point?
I have observed that Zoom seems to use a little bit of TCP
presumably a control channel and mostly UDP I think it’s on
something like port 8801. Not sure if you have 3 or 4 students
in the same house and maybe 1 or 2 adults all Zooming, if
additional ports get used, kind of like VoIP using 5060, 5061,
5062, etc.
*From:* AF <af-boun...@af.afmug.com>
<mailto:af-boun...@af.afmug.com> *On Behalf Of *Adam Moffett
*Sent:* Wednesday, September 2, 2020 12:25 PM
*To:* af@af.afmug.com <mailto:af@af.afmug.com>
*Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Zoom QoS
Apparently they already set DSCP values to 56 for the audio and
40 for the video.
Trusting DSCP from the Internet carries other dangers though
(like Apple thinks iPhone software updates need expedited
forwarding).
On 9/2/2020 1:18 PM, Steve Jones wrote:
zoom and google classroom are surprisingly resilient on their
own. i dont know if its a school setting, or a default, but
it seems it auto scales. I would actually be concerned about
prioritizing it causing it to ramp up resolutions, etc and
cause more net demand. unless maybe find the absolute minimum
requirements and QOS that as the min
On Wed, Sep 2, 2020 at 12:04 PM Adam Moffett
<dmmoff...@gmail.com <mailto:dmmoff...@gmail.com>> wrote:
Is the a simple way to classify Zoom traffic for
prioritizing it? Like
a layer7 match or matching a certain IP block.
School is restarting soon (online) and I'm thinking this
might be a hot
item.
-Adam
--
AF mailing list
AF@af.afmug.com <mailto:AF@af.afmug.com>
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
--
AF mailing list
AF@af.afmug.com <mailto:AF@af.afmug.com>
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
--
AF mailing list
AF@af.afmug.com
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
