Porn isn't zoom.....at least not yet. Maybe that's the next new normal.
Netflix also isn't zoom.
So if 5 kids using Zoom on a 3mbps connection is the problem then what
you say is true. If it's 1 or 2 kids competing with other households'
Netflix and Chill then QoS can address that.
On 9/2/2020 2:19 PM, Ken Hohhof wrote:
If everything is Zoom, and you prioritize Zoom, you prioritize
everything. It’s like everyone is a winner, but if nobody loses,
what’s the point?
I have observed that Zoom seems to use a little bit of TCP presumably
a control channel and mostly UDP I think it’s on something like port
8801. Not sure if you have 3 or 4 students in the same house and
maybe 1 or 2 adults all Zooming, if additional ports get used, kind of
like VoIP using 5060, 5061, 5062, etc.
*From:* AF <af-boun...@af.afmug.com> *On Behalf Of *Adam Moffett
*Sent:* Wednesday, September 2, 2020 12:25 PM
*To:* af@af.afmug.com
*Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Zoom QoS
Apparently they already set DSCP values to 56 for the audio and 40 for
the video.
Trusting DSCP from the Internet carries other dangers though (like
Apple thinks iPhone software updates need expedited forwarding).
On 9/2/2020 1:18 PM, Steve Jones wrote:
zoom and google classroom are surprisingly resilient on their own.
i dont know if its a school setting, or a default, but it seems it
auto scales. I would actually be concerned about prioritizing it
causing it to ramp up resolutions, etc and cause more net demand.
unless maybe find the absolute minimum requirements and QOS that
as the min
On Wed, Sep 2, 2020 at 12:04 PM Adam Moffett <dmmoff...@gmail.com
<mailto:dmmoff...@gmail.com>> wrote:
Is the a simple way to classify Zoom traffic for prioritizing
it? Like
a layer7 match or matching a certain IP block.
School is restarting soon (online) and I'm thinking this might
be a hot
item.
-Adam
--
AF mailing list
AF@af.afmug.com <mailto:AF@af.afmug.com>
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
--
AF mailing list
AF@af.afmug.com
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
