That's ok, what I want to so with them 8 the interim isn't compatible with
the constitution, wel,, maybe its inert to the constitution since I'm not
the government
On Thu, Aug 13, 2020, 7:18 PM Adam Moffett <dmmoff...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I'm pretty sure that's not compatible with the constitution. Although
> maybe you should need a license and a background check before you can
> publish anything posing as a fact. That might make the Internet safer.
> Except The Daily Show and Tucker Carlson are both satire instead of news,
> so they get a fair use exemption.
>
>
> On 8/13/2020 6:25 PM, Steve Jones wrote:
>
> I'm a fan of a press moratorium. We'd definetly be better informed if they
> would all shut down til January.
> I'm not allowed to state publicly what I want to do with them in the
> interim.
>
>
> On Thu, Aug 13, 2020, 5:14 PM <ch...@wbmfg.com> wrote:
>
>> The words “is there a way we can do something like that” was a query by
>> someone ignorant of what is possible in that realm.
>> He was doing his stream of consciousness version of brainstorming.
>>
>> But that is not allowed when you are under the microscope. Partisans
>> will pick any politician apart when they do things like this.
>>
>> Too bad we don’t have any real press, we just have propaganda outlets.
>>
>> *From:* Steve Jones
>> *Sent:* Thursday, August 13, 2020 4:04 PM
>> *To:* AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group
>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Google Chrome "Deceptive Site Ahead"
>>
>> Except the UV light thing was already being done.
>> "It sounds off" said every person who didnt
>>
>> On Thu, Aug 13, 2020, 4:45 PM Bill Prince <part15...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> What he literally said was:
>>>
>>> *"And then I see the disinfectant, where it knocks it out in one minute.
>>> And is there a way we can do something like that, by injection inside or
>>> almost a cleaning, because you see it gets in the lungs and it does a
>>> tremendous number on the lungs, so it’d be interesting to check that, so
>>> that you’re going to have to use medical doctors with, but it sounds
>>> interesting to me."*
>>>
>>> He used the words disinfectant and injection together. Anyone listening
>>> would get the impression he was suggesting that disinfectant could be
>>> injected.
>>>
>>> There was another part about UV light that sort of rambled around too.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> bp
>>> <part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 8/13/2020 1:41 PM, Adam Moffett wrote:
>>>
>>> To be fair, the President never said people should drink bleach. He
>>> remarked that it's so quick and easy to disinfect surfaces, then wondered
>>> out loud if it was possible to disinfect a human's insides, and then turned
>>> to the sidelines and asked someone off camera if they were looking into
>>> that.
>>>
>>> It was still a huge head scratching / face palming moment, but he didn't
>>> actually say anyone should try to disinfect their insides by drinking
>>> bleach or any other means. I think the mis-characterizing of it made it
>>> too easy to say "he didn't say that". Really the story should not have
>>> been been about "President says people should drink bleach"; it should have
>>> been "why does the president need to ask that question?"
>>>
>>>
>>> On 8/13/2020 3:24 PM, Ken Hohhof wrote:
>>>
>>> So if Google told everyone to eat a bug, it would be yep, we’re eating
>>> bugs now?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> President says to drink bleach, and 1% believe it. QAnon says Tom Hanks
>>> and Pope Francis are pedophiles, and 10 or 20% believe it? CDC says to
>>> wear masks, and 50% believe it. Google says eat a bug, and 99% start
>>> chowing down on six-leggers?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Even God seems to have lower credibility than Google. Should our
>>> currency say “In Google We Trust”?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> *From:* AF mailto:af-boun...@af.afmug.com *On Behalf Of *Adam Moffett
>>> *Sent:* Thursday, August 13, 2020 1:52 PM
>>> *To:* af@af.afmug.com
>>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Google Chrome "Deceptive Site Ahead"
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> That's why I mentioned it. But he's not the only person in the world
>>> doing that.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 8/13/2020 2:41 PM, Josh Luthman wrote:
>>>
>>> >often intentionally make the page look like *their* customer's web page
>>>
>>> And that's exactly what the warning is describing.
>>> https://support.google.com/chrome/answer/99020?co=GENIE.Platform%3DDesktop&hl=en
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Josh Luthman
>>> Office: 937-552-2340
>>> Direct: 937-552-2343
>>> 1100 Wayne St
>>> Suite 1337
>>> Troy, OH 45373
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, Aug 13, 2020 at 2:35 PM Larry Smith <lesm...@ecsis.net> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Thu August 13 2020 13:28, Adam Moffett wrote:
>>> > When Chrome users visit a customer's web server they're getting this
>>> > "Deceptive Site Ahead" warning. It's not really my problem, but I want
>>> > to help the guy if I can. Honestly theirs nothing obviously wrong with
>>> > the site, except he provides a B2B service for other companies and they
>>> > often intentionally make the page look like *their* customer's web
>>> > page. Is that sufficient to trigger this, or is there something
>>> > specific Google is looking for?
>>>
>>> Typically this is an infected (contains malware) site.
>>>
>>> --
>>> Larry Smith
>>> lesm...@ecsis.net
>>>
>>> --
>>> AF mailing list
>>> AF@af.afmug.com
>>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> AF mailing list
>>> AF@af.afmug.com
>>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>>>
>> ------------------------------
>> --
>> AF mailing list
>> AF@af.afmug.com
>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>> --
>> AF mailing list
>> AF@af.afmug.com
>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>>
>
> --
> AF mailing list
> AF@af.afmug.com
> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>
--
AF mailing list
AF@af.afmug.com
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
