I do pay for two newspapers and multiple periodicals.  Have not noticed they 
are less biased.

Sent from my iPhone

> On Aug 13, 2020, at 6:22 PM, Bill Prince <part15...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> 
> If we all actually paid for the news, we might. Just maybe. Get more quality 
> news. 
> 
> 
> 
> bp
> <part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com>
> 
> On 8/13/2020 5:17 PM, Adam Moffett wrote:
>> I'm pretty sure that's not compatible with the constitution.  Although maybe 
>> you should need a license and a background check before you can publish 
>> anything posing as a fact.  That might make the Internet safer.  Except The 
>> Daily Show and Tucker Carlson are both satire instead of news, so they get a 
>> fair use exemption.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> On 8/13/2020 6:25 PM, Steve Jones wrote:
>>> I'm a fan of a press moratorium. We'd definetly be better informed if they 
>>> would all shut down til January.
>>> I'm not allowed to state publicly what I want to do with them in the 
>>> interim. 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On Thu, Aug 13, 2020, 5:14 PM <ch...@wbmfg.com> wrote:
>>>> The words “is there a way we can do something like that” was a query by 
>>>> someone ignorant of what is possible in that realm. 
>>>> He was doing his stream of consciousness version of brainstorming. 
>>>>  
>>>> But that is not allowed when you are under the microscope.  Partisans will 
>>>> pick any politician apart when they do things like this. 
>>>>  
>>>> Too bad we don’t have any real press, we just have propaganda outlets. 
>>>>  
>>>> From: Steve Jones
>>>> Sent: Thursday, August 13, 2020 4:04 PM
>>>> To: AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group
>>>> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Google Chrome "Deceptive Site Ahead"
>>>>  
>>>> Except the UV light thing was already being done.
>>>> "It sounds off" said every person who didnt
>>>>  
>>>> On Thu, Aug 13, 2020, 4:45 PM Bill Prince <part15...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> What he literally said was:
>>>>> 
>>>>> "And then I see the disinfectant, where it knocks it out in one minute. 
>>>>> And is there a way we can do something like that, by injection inside or 
>>>>> almost a cleaning, because you see it gets in the lungs and it does a 
>>>>> tremendous number on the lungs, so it’d be interesting to check that, so 
>>>>> that you’re going to have to use medical doctors with, but it sounds 
>>>>> interesting to me."
>>>>> 
>>>>> He used the words disinfectant and injection together. Anyone listening 
>>>>> would get the impression he was suggesting that disinfectant could be 
>>>>> injected.
>>>>> 
>>>>> There was another part about UV light that sort of rambled around too.
>>>>> 
>>>>>  
>>>>> 
>>>>> bp
>>>>> <part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com>
>>>>> 
>>>>> On 8/13/2020 1:41 PM, Adam Moffett wrote:
>>>>>> To be fair, the President never said people should drink bleach.  He 
>>>>>> remarked that it's so quick and easy to disinfect surfaces, then 
>>>>>> wondered out loud if it was possible to disinfect a human's insides, and 
>>>>>> then turned to the sidelines and asked someone off camera if they were 
>>>>>> looking into that.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> It was still a huge head scratching / face palming moment, but he didn't 
>>>>>> actually say anyone should try to disinfect their insides by drinking 
>>>>>> bleach or any other means.  I think the mis-characterizing of it made it 
>>>>>> too easy to say "he didn't say that".  Really the story should not have 
>>>>>> been been about "President says people should drink bleach"; it should 
>>>>>> have been "why does the president need to ask that question?"
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>  
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> On 8/13/2020 3:24 PM, Ken Hohhof wrote:
>>>>>>> So if Google told everyone to eat a bug, it would be yep, we’re eating 
>>>>>>> bugs now?
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>  
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> President says to drink bleach, and 1% believe it.  QAnon says Tom 
>>>>>>> Hanks and Pope Francis are pedophiles, and 10 or 20% believe it?  CDC 
>>>>>>> says to wear masks, and 50% believe it.  Google says eat a bug, and 99% 
>>>>>>> start chowing down on six-leggers?
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>  
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Even God seems to have lower credibility than Google.  Should our 
>>>>>>> currency say “In Google We Trust”?
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>  
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>  
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> From: AF mailto:af-boun...@af.afmug.com On Behalf Of Adam Moffett
>>>>>>> Sent: Thursday, August 13, 2020 1:52 PM
>>>>>>> To: af@af.afmug.com
>>>>>>> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Google Chrome "Deceptive Site Ahead"
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>  
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> That's why I mentioned it.  But he's not the only person in the world 
>>>>>>> doing that.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>  
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> On 8/13/2020 2:41 PM, Josh Luthman wrote:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> >often intentionally make the page look like *their* customer's web page
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> And that's exactly what the warning is describing.   
>>>>>>> https://support.google.com/chrome/answer/99020?co=GENIE.Platform%3DDesktop&hl=en
>>>>>>>   
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>  
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Josh Luthman
>>>>>>> Office: 937-552-2340
>>>>>>> Direct: 937-552-2343
>>>>>>> 1100 Wayne St
>>>>>>> Suite 1337
>>>>>>> Troy, OH 45373
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>  
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>  
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> On Thu, Aug 13, 2020 at 2:35 PM Larry Smith <lesm...@ecsis.net> wrote:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> On Thu August 13 2020 13:28, Adam Moffett wrote:
>>>>>>> > When Chrome users visit a customer's web server they're getting this
>>>>>>> > "Deceptive Site Ahead" warning.  It's not really my problem, but I 
>>>>>>> > want
>>>>>>> > to help the guy if I can.  Honestly theirs nothing obviously wrong 
>>>>>>> > with
>>>>>>> > the site, except he provides a B2B service for other companies and 
>>>>>>> > they
>>>>>>> > often intentionally make the page look like *their* customer's web
>>>>>>> > page.  Is that sufficient to trigger this, or is there something
>>>>>>> > specific Google is looking for?
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Typically this is an infected (contains malware) site.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> -- 
>>>>>>> Larry Smith
>>>>>>> lesm...@ecsis.net
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> -- 
>>>>>>> AF mailing list
>>>>>>> AF@af.afmug.com
>>>>>>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>> -- 
>>>>> AF mailing list
>>>>> AF@af.afmug.com
>>>>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>>>> 
>>>> -- 
>>>> AF mailing list
>>>> AF@af.afmug.com
>>>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>>>> -- 
>>>> AF mailing list
>>>> AF@af.afmug.com
>>>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>>> 
>> 
> -- 
> AF mailing list
> AF@af.afmug.com
> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
-- 
AF mailing list
AF@af.afmug.com
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com

Reply via email to