I'm pretty sure that's not compatible with the constitution. Although
maybe you should need a license and a background check before you can
publish anything posing as a fact. That might make the Internet safer.
Except The Daily Show and Tucker Carlson are both satire instead of
news, so they get a fair use exemption.
On 8/13/2020 6:25 PM, Steve Jones wrote:
I'm a fan of a press moratorium. We'd definetly be better informed if
they would all shut down til January.
I'm not allowed to state publicly what I want to do with them in the
interim.
On Thu, Aug 13, 2020, 5:14 PM <ch...@wbmfg.com
<mailto:ch...@wbmfg.com>> wrote:
The words “is there a way we can do something like that” was a
query by someone ignorant of what is possible in that realm.
He was doing his stream of consciousness version of brainstorming.
But that is not allowed when you are under the microscope.
Partisans will pick any politician apart when they do things like
this.
Too bad we don’t have any real press, we just have propaganda
outlets.
*From:* Steve Jones
*Sent:* Thursday, August 13, 2020 4:04 PM
*To:* AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group
*Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Google Chrome "Deceptive Site Ahead"
Except the UV light thing was already being done.
"It sounds off" said every person who didnt
On Thu, Aug 13, 2020, 4:45 PM Bill Prince <part15...@gmail.com> wrote:
What he literally said was:
/"And then I see the disinfectant, where it knocks it out
in one minute. And is there a way we can do something like
that, by injection inside or almost a cleaning, because
you see it gets in the lungs and it does a tremendous
number on the lungs, so it’d be interesting to check that,
so that you’re going to have to use medical doctors with,
but it sounds interesting to me."/
He used the words disinfectant and injection together. Anyone
listening would get the impression he was suggesting that
disinfectant could be injected.
There was another part about UV light that sort of rambled
around too.
bp
<part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com>
On 8/13/2020 1:41 PM, Adam Moffett wrote:
To be fair, the President never said people should drink
bleach. He remarked that it's so quick and easy to disinfect
surfaces, then wondered out loud if it was possible to
disinfect a human's insides, and then turned to the sidelines
and asked someone off camera if they were looking into that.
It was still a huge head scratching / face palming moment,
but he didn't actually say anyone should try to disinfect
their insides by drinking bleach or any other means. I think
the mis-characterizing of it made it too easy to say "he
didn't say that". Really the story should not have been been
about "President says people should drink bleach"; it should
have been "why does the president need to ask that question?"
On 8/13/2020 3:24 PM, Ken Hohhof wrote:
So if Google told everyone to eat a bug, it would be yep,
we’re eating bugs now?
President says to drink bleach, and 1% believe it. QAnon
says Tom Hanks and Pope Francis are pedophiles, and 10 or
20% believe it? CDC says to wear masks, and 50% believe it.
Google says eat a bug, and 99% start chowing down on
six-leggers?
Even God seems to have lower credibility than Google. Should
our currency say “In Google We Trust”?
*From:* AF mailto:af-boun...@af.afmug.com *On Behalf Of
*Adam Moffett
*Sent:* Thursday, August 13, 2020 1:52 PM
*To:* af@af.afmug.com
*Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Google Chrome "Deceptive Site Ahead"
That's why I mentioned it. But he's not the only person in
the world doing that.
On 8/13/2020 2:41 PM, Josh Luthman wrote:
>often intentionally make the page look like *their*
customer's web page
And that's exactly what the warning is describing.
https://support.google.com/chrome/answer/99020?co=GENIE.Platform%3DDesktop&hl=en
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Thu, Aug 13, 2020 at 2:35 PM Larry Smith
<lesm...@ecsis.net> wrote:
On Thu August 13 2020 13:28, Adam Moffett wrote:
> When Chrome users visit a customer's web server
they're getting this
> "Deceptive Site Ahead" warning. It's not really
my problem, but I want
> to help the guy if I can. Honestly theirs nothing
obviously wrong with
> the site, except he provides a B2B service for
other companies and they
> often intentionally make the page look like
*their* customer's web
> page. Is that sufficient to trigger this, or is
there something
> specific Google is looking for?
Typically this is an infected (contains malware) site.
--
Larry Smith
lesm...@ecsis.net
--
AF mailing list
AF@af.afmug.com
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
--
AF mailing list
AF@af.afmug.com
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
AF mailing list
AF@af.afmug.com <mailto:AF@af.afmug.com>
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
--
AF mailing list
AF@af.afmug.com <mailto:AF@af.afmug.com>
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
--
AF mailing list
AF@af.afmug.com
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
