Same here. Many licensed Part 101 and Part 90 transmitters on rooftops,
poles, etc with no ASR and no FAA study.
On 8/9/2020 9:10 AM, Mathew Howard wrote:
Yeah, there's no need for an ASR... I've always given it to the
coordinator if there is one, but when it's on a structure that doesn't
have an ASR (and doesn't require one), nobody has ever questioned it.
On Sun, Aug 9, 2020, 7:12 AM Lewis Bergman <lewis.berg...@gmail.com
<mailto:lewis.berg...@gmail.com>> wrote:
Maybe things have changed but an ASR was never required for
licensed transmitters by the FCC. A lot of coordinators required
them because it makes their job easier, but they weren't required
by the FCC.
On Sat, Aug 8, 2020 at 9:15 AM Kurt Fankhauser
<lists.wavel...@gmail.com <mailto:lists.wavel...@gmail.com>> wrote:
How were you able to put up two 18ghz links on that tower
before you were able to get an ASR number from the FCC?
On Fri, Aug 7, 2020 at 12:18 PM Ken Hohhof <af...@kwisp.com
<mailto:af...@kwisp.com>> wrote:
Good news, FAA finished their determination on a 45 foot
tower that has been there for 20 years, and which isn’t
higher than the power poles between us and the airport.
It only took them 4 months.
Not sure what I would have done if they had denied it. We
already put up two 18 GHz links off the tower (replacing 5
GHz).
--
AF mailing list
AF@af.afmug.com <mailto:AF@af.afmug.com>
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
--
AF mailing list
AF@af.afmug.com <mailto:AF@af.afmug.com>
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
--
Lewis Bergman
325-439-0533 Cell
--
AF mailing list
AF@af.afmug.com <mailto:AF@af.afmug.com>
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
--
AF mailing list
AF@af.afmug.com
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
