There are several variants:

Single Frequency Groups (SFG) are multiple CBSD’s that all operate on the same 
frequency.     If you are going WTF - of course the base station and the CPE’s 
are all a single frequency group - keep in mind that in the mobile world the 
handsets are not CBSD’s.   For our purposes each BS and all of it’s CPE’s have 
to be in a single frequency group.  This is also for frequency reuse - if you 
use channels A, B, C on your network and reuse them in some type of pattern you 
would designate all of the A’s in one SFG, B’s in another, etc.   If a SFG has 
to change channels they all have to change together.

Coexistence groups would be systems where timing parameters match.   Think 
multiple operators running LTE or a proprietary protocol on a common UL:DL 
ratio.   Not all use cases want to use the same UL:DL ratio.

Mark

> On Jul 28, 2020, at 6:42 PM, Mike Hammett <af...@ics-il.net> wrote:
> 
> As far as the SAS is concerned, it's all irrelevant.
> 
> They were talking about coexistence groups where a group of operators could 
> have overlapping assignments because the operators are using some mechanism 
> to coexist in the channels assigned. I don't know if those made it to the 
> end, nor what form they've taken.
> 
> 
> 
> -----
> Mike Hammett
> Intelligent Computing Solutions <http://www.ics-il.com/>
>  <https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL> 
> <https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb> 
> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions> 
> <https://twitter.com/ICSIL>
> Midwest Internet Exchange <http://www.midwest-ix.com/>
>  <https://www.facebook.com/mdwestix> 
> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/midwest-internet-exchange> 
> <https://twitter.com/mdwestix>
> The Brothers WISP <http://www.thebrotherswisp.com/>
>  <https://www.facebook.com/thebrotherswisp>
> 
> 
>  <https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCXSdfxQv7SpoRQYNyLwntZg>
> From: "Matt Hoppes" <mattli...@rivervalleyinternet.net>
> To: "AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group" <af@af.afmug.com>
> Sent: Tuesday, July 28, 2020 5:11:04 PM
> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Auction results so far
> 
> Not at all. If I am running the same standard as someone else and the same 
> split then I can synchronize with them and we aren’t going to interfere even 
> if we’re relatively close. If on the other hand we are not running the same 
> standards in the same split then we are going to interfere with each other 
> even if we are very far away from each other.
> 
> On Jul 28, 2020, at 6:01 PM, Mike Hammett <af...@ics-il.net> wrote:
> 
> 
> The standards and settings are irrelevant. Tx power - loss = receive power.
> 
> 
> 
> -----
> Mike Hammett
> Intelligent Computing Solutions <http://www.ics-il.com/>
>  <https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL> 
> <https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb> 
> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions> 
> <https://twitter.com/ICSIL>
> Midwest Internet Exchange <http://www.midwest-ix.com/>
>  <https://www.facebook.com/mdwestix> 
> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/midwest-internet-exchange> 
> <https://twitter.com/mdwestix>
> The Brothers WISP <http://www.thebrotherswisp.com/>
>  <https://www.facebook.com/thebrotherswisp>
> 
> 
>  <https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCXSdfxQv7SpoRQYNyLwntZg>
> From: "Matt Hoppes" <mattli...@rivervalleyinternet.net>
> To: "AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group" <af@af.afmug.com>
> Sent: Tuesday, July 28, 2020 4:55:27 PM
> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Auction results so far
> 
> How does the SASI sure there will be no interference? Since you can run so 
> many different standards and settings?
> 
> 
> 
> On Jul 28, 2020, at 5:03 PM, Steve Jones <thatoneguyst...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> 
> Yep, and anyone not operating in cbrs without SAS gets big dollar reminders 
> to stop
> 
> On Tue, Jul 28, 2020, 3:59 PM Kurt Fankhauser <lists.wavel...@gmail.com 
> <mailto:lists.wavel...@gmail.com>> wrote:
> Josh,
> 
> You will have interference protection through the SAS so that someone just 
> can't blindly fire up right on top of your channel right next to you. Every 
> AP has to get a grant from SAS before it can transmit. Also if Demand says 15 
> there is no way to tell if that is 15 individual bidders or if 4-5 bidders 
> are trying to bid on 4x10mhz channels each. We will know when the auction is 
> over more info but while the auction is taking place everything is a secret.
> 
> 
> On Tue, Jul 28, 2020 at 4:09 PM Josh Luthman <j...@imaginenetworksllc.com 
> <mailto:j...@imaginenetworksllc.com>> wrote:
> Well if you do licensed PTP links it seems you don't get any kind of 
> interference protection if someone else doesn't play by the rules and they 
> don't get any punishment for doing so...
> 
> If you think CBRS will give you interference free protection I'd love to know 
> you do because I don't feel that's going to be a game changer for hitting 
> customers.
> 
> Josh Luthman
> Office: 937-552-2340
> Direct: 937-552-2343
> 1100 Wayne St
> Suite 1337
> Troy, OH 45373
> 
> 
> On Tue, Jul 28, 2020 at 3:42 PM Steve Jones <thatoneguyst...@gmail.com 
> <mailto:thatoneguyst...@gmail.com>> wrote:
> drinking! They be purchased after the auction? 
> Divided over 10 years,  it's a manageable number for interference free 
> spectrum. What do you pay per year in interference related truck rolls, tech 
> time and list satisfaction?
> 
> On Tue, Jul 28, 2020, 12:06 PM Mike Hammett <af...@ics-il.net 
> <mailto:af...@ics-il.net>> wrote:
> Obviously the last round is public knowledge. After the auction is over, are 
> the results of all rounds public information?
> 
> 
> 
> -----
> Mike Hammett
> Intelligent Computing Solutions <http://www.ics-il.com/>
>  <https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL> 
> <https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb> 
> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions> 
> <https://twitter.com/ICSIL>
> Midwest Internet Exchange <http://www.midwest-ix.com/>
>  <https://www.facebook.com/mdwestix> 
> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/midwest-internet-exchange> 
> <https://twitter.com/mdwestix>
> The Brothers WISP <http://www.thebrotherswisp.com/>
>  <https://www.facebook.com/thebrotherswisp>
> 
> 
>  <https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCXSdfxQv7SpoRQYNyLwntZg>
> From: "Mark Radabaugh" <m...@amplex.net <mailto:m...@amplex.net>>
> To: "AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group" <af@af.afmug.com 
> <mailto:af@af.afmug.com>>
> Sent: Tuesday, July 28, 2020 11:11:20 AM
> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Auction results so far
> 
> Correct - no way to tell who is bidding.   The complete list of bidders is 
> public knowledge:  
> https://www.fcc.gov/document/auction-105-35-ghz-qualified-bidders 
> <https://www.fcc.gov/document/auction-105-35-ghz-qualified-bidders>
> 
> Which counties those 271 bidders are bidding on is only known by the FCC
> 
> Mark
> 
> 
> 
> On Jul 28, 2020, at 12:03 PM, Josh Luthman <j...@imaginenetworksllc.com 
> <mailto:j...@imaginenetworksllc.com>> wrote:
> 
> I assume the 14 or 15 bidders is a closely guarded secret?  I can't begin to 
> think who would be able to pay 30k around here for that besides 
> Verizon/AT&T/Sprint...
> 
> Josh Luthman
> Office: 937-552-2340
> Direct: 937-552-2343
> 1100 Wayne St
> Suite 1337
> Troy, OH 45373
> 
> 
> On Tue, Jul 28, 2020 at 11:37 AM Mark Radabaugh <m...@amplex.net 
> <mailto:m...@amplex.net>> wrote:
> Note that the confidentiality and anti collusion rules apply for anyone who 
> filed the short form.   Be very careful that what you say in here does not 
> violate the FCC rules.   
> 
> Everything discussed so far is from the public information the FCC is 
> releasing or from the auction public notice.
> 
> To read the results Josh posted:
> 
> The price does not include discounts - 75% of the posted price if you 
> qualified as being under 25M/year in revenue - so closer to 27k    There is 
> also a rural provider credit.
> 
> It reads:  
> 
> In the initial round the price of one 10Mhz PAL was $21,000 not counting any 
> discounts you may have been eligible for.  There were 14 bids at that price, 
> with only 7 lots available.  
> In the second round the price of one PAL was $24,000  (less discounts).  
> There were 15 bids at that price, with only 7 available.
> 
> In the 5th round the price for one PAL went up to $33,000 (less discounts) 
> with demand down to 10 PAL’s.   The price went up for ALL 7 of the PAL’s.
> 
> The price will keep going up until the demand is equal to 7.   Once demand 
> gets to 7 there is still a posted price increase - but unless someone adds 
> additional demand the price will stay at the previous start of round price.
> 
> The price/demand could sit at 7 for the next (insert number) of rounds and 
> then start going back up if another bidder decides they are priced out of one 
> county and want to move to another county.  Or if they are just playing games.
> 
> Once  a county is at or above a demand for 7 PAL’s the price won’t go down.   
>  If you get a PAL in a round and later decide you don’t want it, you are 
> stuck buying it unless someone else bids at the higher price.   You can 
> change your demand to 0, saying you don’t want it anymore, but unless someone 
> else wants it you are stuck with it.   Just like a normal auction - once you 
> are the winning bidder, you own it unless someone outbids you.
> 
> For bidders there are required activity levels that you have to meet.  
> Essentially you have to bid 95% of your initial deposit on each round.   If 
> you don’t bid that what you are allowed to bid in the next round goes down.   
> The rule is basically to keep bidders from sandbagging - if you haven’t been 
> bidding and are just waiting to see what others are going to do you will run 
> out of eligibility pretty quickly. 
> 
> Mark
> 
> On Jul 28, 2020, at 10:24 AM, Cassidy B. Larson <c...@infowest.com 
> <mailto:c...@infowest.com>> wrote:
> 
> It’s up to 37k per 10mhz block. Demand is going down though! lol 
> 
> Sent from my iPhone
> 
> On Jul 28, 2020, at 08:22, Josh Luthman <j...@imaginenetworksllc.com 
> <mailto:j...@imaginenetworksllc.com>> wrote:
> 
> 
> No idea how to read this:
> 
> <image.png>
> 
> 
> Josh Luthman
> Office: 937-552-2340
> Direct: 937-552-2343
> 1100 Wayne St
> Suite 1337
> Troy, OH 45373
> 
> 
> On Tue, Jul 28, 2020 at 10:20 AM Kurt Fankhauser <lists.wavel...@gmail.com 
> <mailto:lists.wavel...@gmail.com>> wrote:
> Josh,
> 
> Is your county up to 30k per 10mhz block?
> 
> On Tue, Jul 28, 2020 at 10:08 AM Josh Baird <joshba...@gmail.com 
> <mailto:joshba...@gmail.com>> wrote:
> Assuming it's too late at this point to get into the initial rounds that are 
> taking place this week?
> 
> Haven't really been keeping up with this.
> 
> On Tue, Jul 28, 2020 at 9:54 AM Adam Moffett <dmmoff...@gmail.com 
> <mailto:dmmoff...@gmail.com>> wrote:
> I also lost track of the whole auction situation.  Will there be another 
> round later?  Seems like nobody bid on some of the counties around us, and I 
> wish I'd thrown in a minimum bid at this point.
> 
> On 7/28/2020 12:40 AM, Steve Jones wrote:
> Our starting bid was relatively inexpensive over the ten year term for our 5 
> counties and 4 pals each. Almost had the boss talked into giving it serious 
> consideration so i could pull the trigger on the auction. then the world 
> ended and that got back burnered. byt the time we came back to it there was 
> no time to learn enough about the auction
> 
> On Mon, Jul 27, 2020 at 9:54 PM Dave <dmilho...@wletc.com 
> <mailto:dmilho...@wletc.com>> wrote:
> My guess is none...
> 
> Im sooo sick of the BS games the FCC and 'BIG BOYZ' Are playing.
> 
> So funny how they say "Sure anyone can get a pal"
> 
> FCC should have shoved a big FU to all WISPs and just let us die.
> 
> When I first saw the pricing on our county and surrounding countys for 
> bid I knew there was no chance.
> 
> Let the lawsuits FLY...
> 
> 
> On 7/27/2020 5:51 PM, Seth Mattinen wrote:
> > On 7/27/20 15:42, Mark Radabaugh wrote:
> >> https://auctiondata.fcc.gov/public/projects/auction105 
> >> <https://auctiondata.fcc.gov/public/projects/auction105>
> >>
> >
> >
> > I'm curious to see how many WISPs actually get a PAL when this is all 
> > done.
> >
> 
> -- 
> AF mailing list
> AF@af.afmug.com <mailto:AF@af.afmug.com>
> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com 
> <http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com>
> 
> -- 
> AF mailing list
> AF@af.afmug.com <mailto:AF@af.afmug.com>
> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com 
> <http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com>
> -- 
> AF mailing list
> AF@af.afmug.com <mailto:AF@af.afmug.com>
> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com 
> <http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com>
> -- 
> AF mailing list
> AF@af.afmug.com <mailto:AF@af.afmug.com>
> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com 
> <http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com>
> -- 
> AF mailing list
> AF@af.afmug.com <mailto:AF@af.afmug.com>
> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com 
> <http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com>
> -- 
> AF mailing list
> AF@af.afmug.com <mailto:AF@af.afmug.com>
> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com 
> <http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com>
> 
> -- 
> AF mailing list
> AF@af.afmug.com <mailto:AF@af.afmug.com>
> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com 
> <http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com>
> -- 
> AF mailing list
> AF@af.afmug.com <mailto:AF@af.afmug.com>
> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com 
> <http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com>
> 
> 
> -- 
> AF mailing list
> AF@af.afmug.com <mailto:AF@af.afmug.com>
> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com 
> <http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com>
> 
> -- 
> AF mailing list
> AF@af.afmug.com <mailto:AF@af.afmug.com>
> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com 
> <http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com>
> -- 
> AF mailing list
> AF@af.afmug.com <mailto:AF@af.afmug.com>
> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com 
> <http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com>
> -- 
> AF mailing list
> AF@af.afmug.com <mailto:AF@af.afmug.com>
> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com 
> <http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com>
> -- 
> AF mailing list
> AF@af.afmug.com <mailto:AF@af.afmug.com>
> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com 
> <http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com>
> -- 
> AF mailing list
> AF@af.afmug.com
> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
> 
> -- 
> AF mailing list
> AF@af.afmug.com
> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
> 
> -- 
> AF mailing list
> AF@af.afmug.com
> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
> 
> -- 
> AF mailing list
> AF@af.afmug.com
> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
> 
> -- 
> AF mailing list
> AF@af.afmug.com
> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com

-- 
AF mailing list
AF@af.afmug.com
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com

Reply via email to