General.  These are the hottest customers we have and the top couple didn't
have anything weird in the graphs.

[image: image.png]

Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373


On Thu, Jun 25, 2020 at 11:32 AM Nate Burke <n...@blastcomm.com> wrote:

> On close SM's or just an SM in general?
>
> On 6/25/2020 10:29 AM, Josh Luthman wrote:
>
> I think mine started with 4.4.3.  Could be wrong.
>
> I get -65 normally but SNMP will show -89 here and there.  eAlign shows
> -65 give or take a db.
>
> Josh Luthman
> Office: 937-552-2340
> Direct: 937-552-2343
> 1100 Wayne St
> Suite 1337
> Troy, OH 45373
>
>
> On Thu, Jun 25, 2020 at 11:07 AM Nate Burke <n...@blastcomm.com> wrote:
>
>> Because of Internal politics, I have a customer that needed 2 separate
>> radio feeds.  So I have 2 EPMP force 200 radios on the same pole, about
>> 1' apart.
>>
>> After upgrading to 4.4.3 these 2 radios give really strange signal
>> readings.  They appear to be working normally, with no complaints from
>> the customer.  They should be around -70db, but watching the webpage
>> (Also SNMP reports the same) they will bounce between -70db and -20db
>> every couple seconds.  The EAlign page does not reflect this, it just
>> stays steady at -70.
>>
>> Of all the hundreds of EPMP Sm's that I've upgraded to 4.4.3, these 2
>> are the only ones that have this problem.  Is there some sort of self
>> interference going on because the SM's are so close?  They are both
>> attached to the same AP, no other radio on the AP has this issue.  I
>> don't think I have another location where 2 SM radios are this close
>> physically.  The signal was reporting normally until upgrading to 4.4.3
>>
>> Anyone else seen this?
>>
>> --
>> AF mailing list
>> AF@af.afmug.com
>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>>
>
>
>
> --
> AF mailing list
> AF@af.afmug.com
> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>
-- 
AF mailing list
AF@af.afmug.com
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com

Reply via email to