Would you please articulate specifically "what is right" in this situation?
I am asking for your non-political opinion of the most constructive way
forward.

On Sat, Apr 25, 2020 at 8:24 PM Steve Jones <thatoneguyst...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> I sit back and watch as people contradict their own statements. "Its going
> to be here like this for years" "tests are growing, as is the number" "it's
> been here longer than we think" "it hasn't peaked because muh testing"
> "it's going to be worse in fall" "mitigation has had a major impact"
> The best is regarding the medication mien fuehrer  liked. "Its only
> anecdotal" "a tiny group had a negative outcome, thisnis the gold standard
> and this drug must be banned"
>
> I live in a state where our governor is in a pissing contest with the
> White House, but doing pretty much what the White House recommends, with
> the exception of looking at things by region. We only have two regions,
> chicago, and people who voted for the current president at 1600. So the
> whole of downstate will be punished for not voting the right way. When
> asked about the data, for the "science" behind this, we were told the state
> doesnt own the data, so we cant see it.
>
> I'm part of a foster parent group. One of the fosters is utterly destroyed
> right now. Her prior ward, that she stayed in contact with died 3 days ago
> at 15. He had returned home, but went back into the system during this (our
> state, in its infinite wisdom has effectively shut down the foster support
> system, non essential and all) he couldn't come back to her because she is
> at capacity. He had cancer and was in a drug trial. He had been thriving.
> The governors orders didnt allow for him to get access to the trial
> resources, so he lost his trial spot, as is the nature of trials. There
> were no resources available to get him into a linear treatment. 3 days ago
> he succumbed to the complication. While anecdotal, this is exactly what the
> cure being worse than the disease looks like. Granted, the speed at which
> he declined from thriving to dead indicates underlying issues, the chicago
> emperors orders made certain there were no resources. Right now, thanks to
> the emperors orders, there are approximately zero resources available to
> the foster families. Anticipate a whole lot of negative outcomes.
>
> Point is, everybody is more concerned about proving how wrong their
> political enemy is, that nobody is even actually looking for what is right.
>
> Thankfully mother nature doesnt care and this will, like all ailments of
> proximity, diminish in the next week or so.
>
> On Sat, Apr 25, 2020, 5:48 PM Bill Prince <part15...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Just listened (in part) to a discussion about COVID-19 as it regards
>> China/US relations. It is a discussion between Dubner, Michèle Flournoy (
>> former undersecretary of defense and co-founder of strategic-advisory firm
>> WestExec.), and Michael Auslin (historian at Stanford University’s Hoover
>> Institution).
>>
>> Within the discussion Auslin asserts that the death toll within Wuhan
>> alone was between 45 and 47 thousand; at least 10X what they have reported
>> through official channels. He gets his data through croudsourcing
>> crematoria activity and the number of people picking up urns of deceased
>> family members.
>>
>> If you don't have time to listen to this, it is at least worth a read of
>> the transcript.
>>
>> https://freakonomics.com/podcast/covid-19-china/
>>
>>
>> bp
>> <part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com>
>>
>>
>> On 4/25/2020 3:11 PM, Jaime Solorza wrote:
>>
>> This virus doesn't care if you are a Republican, a Democrat, an
>> Independent, agnostic, religious or an atheist...if it gets you it might
>> kill you...
>> Stay smart, listen to doctors and scientists....not ineptus maximus
>> politicians.
>>
>> On Sat, Apr 25, 2020, 12:45 PM Bill Prince <part15...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> As we test more, we are undoubtedly going to find more cases that were
>>> previously going undetected (asymptomatic infection). This is a long way
>>> from over. The other thing we have not come to grips with is the uneven
>>> spread/mitigation.
>>>
>>> There was an interesting graphic for the state of California showing the
>>> state as a whole versus just the Bay Area (Mercury News this morning). The
>>> 7 counties around the bay instituted shelter in place very early, and it's
>>> beginning to show in the statistics. The Bay Area accounts for almost 18%
>>> of the entire state population (7 of the 40 million).
>>>
>>>
>>> bp
>>> <part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 4/25/2020 8:45 AM, ch...@wbmfg.com wrote:
>>>
>>> [image: image]
>>>
>>> Might be Chebyshev BPF though... hopefully...Bessell.
>>> Hopefully not high pass...
>>>
>>> --
>>> AF mailing list
>>> AF@af.afmug.com
>>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>>>
>>
>> --
>> AF mailing list
>> AF@af.afmug.com
>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>>
> --
> AF mailing list
> AF@af.afmug.com
> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>
-- 
AF mailing list
AF@af.afmug.com
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com

Reply via email to