SM locations were also supposed to be registered.
Good luck registering locations at this late date though. The applications will be accepted but are likely to get stuck in “Pending”. From: AF <af-boun...@af.afmug.com> On Behalf Of Chris Fabien Sent: Wednesday, February 26, 2020 9:38 AM To: AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group <af@af.afmug.com> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 3.65 NN License Expiry So sounds like consensus is we can continue to operate under the NN license until 10/24/2022? I do have these AP locations registered and will double check power is within limits. Thanks Chris On Wed, Feb 26, 2020, 10:32 AM Mark Radabaugh <m...@amplex.net <mailto:m...@amplex.net> > wrote: I would very much second that statement - make sure you are following all the rules for 90z going forward. Mark On Feb 26, 2020, at 10:25 AM, Mathew Howard <mhoward...@gmail.com <mailto:mhoward...@gmail.com> > wrote: Yeah, but tricky part is going to be stuff that's still operating legally under an unexpired license that the SAS can't manage. I think it would be wise to make sure everything is properly registered and you're not doing anything questionable if you plan to keep operating under the old rules much beyond April. On Wed, Feb 26, 2020 at 9:17 AM Steve Jones <thatoneguyst...@gmail.com <mailto:thatoneguyst...@gmail.com> > wrote: I was told when I asked about examples being made that hopefully SAS will sort things out on its own. If it goes outside of SAS being able to manage an issue, such all illegal operators, particularly when more sensing capability comes into play with SAS 2.0, you do not want to be the guy who gets nailed. Apparently this iteration of the SAS modality is an entry run for a much larger spectrum management, as is the cowboy days are over moving forward On Wed, Feb 26, 2020 at 8:54 AM Mathew Howard <mhoward...@gmail.com <mailto:mhoward...@gmail.com> > wrote: Yeah, I agree, they probably will make an example out of a few operators. But I don't see any reason why they'd bother with somebody who still has a valid license. They'll probably go after some guys that are blatantly running some old Ubiquiti or WiMax gear after their license expires. On Wed, Feb 26, 2020 at 6:56 AM Mark Radabaugh <m...@amplex.net <mailto:m...@amplex.net> > wrote: > On Feb 25, 2020, at 5:20 PM, Mathew Howard <mhoward...@gmail.com > <mailto:mhoward...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > <cut> > I would assume that if a CBRS operator puts up gear that you're interfering > with, it's going to be handled pretty much the same way it was under the old > rules (in other words, work it out with eachother, or shut up and live with > it)... there's a reason that they made 3650-3700 GAA only. > I would expect the FCC to make an example of a couple of operators who continue to operate 90z equipment illegally after the license expires. We all have too much to lose here if the operators are not running legally and the mobile industry starts another attempt to push everyone out that isn’t a mobile carrier. Mark -- AF mailing list AF@af.afmug.com <mailto:AF@af.afmug.com> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com -- AF mailing list AF@af.afmug.com <mailto:AF@af.afmug.com> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com -- AF mailing list AF@af.afmug.com <mailto:AF@af.afmug.com> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com -- AF mailing list AF@af.afmug.com <mailto:AF@af.afmug.com> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com -- AF mailing list AF@af.afmug.com <mailto:AF@af.afmug.com> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
-- AF mailing list AF@af.afmug.com http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
