The Apple model of sales, which worked really well until Microsoft came along... People will pay more as long as they don't see an alternative, then will jump in a second.

On 12/14/2019 12:48 PM, Darin Steffl wrote:
We're small but we had a small price increase October of 2018 and added another $7,000 per month in revenue. We lost 2 customers from it. So we lost $140 in revenue to gain $7,000 more.

It was a no brainer. We probably had 5% of customers want clarification of the increase above and beyond what we put in the email but everyone else just paid more without being mad.

Our price increases that we're doing now through June should add a decent amount of revenue and we expect to lose less than 15 customers. We would have to lose over 200 customers for the price increase to hurt us. If we lose anywhere from 1 to 199 customers, we'll still have the same revenue but now much higher profit because we eliminated bandwidth usage, support load, and freed up equipment from 200 accounts.

I see so many wisp's worried about marketshare when they should be thinking about profit. I don't want the most customers, I want the highest revenue customers because it means less people to support with the same revenue and much higher profit.

On Sat, Dec 14, 2019, 3:15 PM <ch...@wbmfg.com <mailto:ch...@wbmfg.com>> wrote:

    Funny, there is a study, probably an econ professor, the looked at
    what people bought at the car wash.  The majority chose the option
    one up from the bottom.
    In a prior life I eliminated the bottom “economy plan” which
    actually had the majority of our customers due to “the very few
    customers on this plan” .
    People  inside the company thought I was nuts.  I calculated the
    number of people that we would have to lose compared to those being
    forced up.  If we lost more than 200 customers it would have been a
    boneheaded decision.  We lost 65 customers.
    I still get mentions of this from former employees,   saying it was
    a disasterous decision.  Nope, made us considerably more money each
    month.  Sorry that those employees were not clued into the gambit.
    (Do I care....not really...)
    *From:* Darin Steffl
    *Sent:* Saturday, December 14, 2019 1:07 PM
    *To:* AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group
    *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Google WiFi and 5 GHz interference
    Yes the $90 plan on rural pricing and $75 plan on city pricing.
    We have lots of customers on old plans at lower pricing that were
    slowly migrating up. Our ARPU is $71 and increasing. Hoping to get
    it to $80 by June.
    On Sat, Dec 14, 2019, 3:02 PM <ch...@wbmfg.com> wrote:

        I mean which plans are your more popular.
        I would guess the plan one notch up from the bottom?
        *From:* Darin Steffl
        *Sent:* Saturday, December 14, 2019 12:56 PM
        *To:* AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group
        *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Google WiFi and 5 GHz interference
        Chuck,
        We qualify each address to find out which speeds we put them on
        the best plan and price we can if they're in an area with horns.
        But right now, 80% of our new customer installs are rural areas
        with the higher pricing and lower speed plans I linked to. We're
        no longer building any new sites in town because of how busy we are.
        DSL, Satellite, and cellular have all been getting much worse in
        our area so people are seeking us out more than ever.
        On Sat, Dec 14, 2019, 2:50 PM <ch...@wbmfg.com> wrote:

            Which is more popular?
            *From:* Darin Steffl
            *Sent:* Saturday, December 14, 2019 12:29 PM
            *To:* AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group
            *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Google WiFi and 5 GHz interference
            Rural pricing:
            http://www.mnwifi.com/service-plans/internet-service/fup
            City pricing where we have horns:
            http://www.mnwifi.com/service-plans/internet-service/5g-plans/
            On Sat, Dec 14, 2019, 2:17 PM <ch...@wbmfg.com> wrote:

                Mind sharing your plan prices?
                *From:* Darin Steffl
                *Sent:* Saturday, December 14, 2019 12:06 PM
                *To:* AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group
                *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Google WiFi and 5 GHz interference
                We used to charge $50 upfront and $10 per month for
                Calix. Now we just increased our plan prices and give
                the Calix away for free.
                We have 99% take rate when it's free.
                On Sat, Dec 14, 2019, 12:30 PM Kurt Fankhauser
                <lists.wavel...@gmail.com> wrote:

                    Sean,
                    Do you charge the customer for any up-front hardware
                    costs when you install Calix or are you only getting
                    ROI from the $12/monthly ??
                    On Sat, Dec 14, 2019 at 3:38 AM Sean Heskett
                    <af...@zirkel.us> wrote:

                        We install a Calix as a “trial” so we have
                        visibility into their network and voila all
                        their Wi-Fi problems go away.  After the free
                        month trial it becomes a paid service and for
$12/mo we make sure their Wi-Fi keeps working. Win-win for us and them ;-)
                        -Sean
                        On Fri, Dec 13, 2019 at 10:33 AM Ken Hohhof
                        <af...@kwisp.com> wrote:

                            Has anyone figured out a solution to
                            interference with Google WiFi at customers
                            fed via 5 GHz?____

                            ____

                            We have found it to be an unsolvable problem
                            due to:____

                            ____

                            1)  Google does not let you set the
                            frequencies____

                            2)  Google does not let you set the channel
                            width (and therefore presumably uses 80 MHz
                            channels)____

                            3)  The mesh system presumably uses
                            additional spectrum for the backhaul between
                            pucks____

                            4)  Most customers put in 3 of them,
                            virtually guaranteeing at least 1 of them
                            will be right near the dish to the tower____

                            5)  Many customers also figure they can put
                            them in outbuildings to get service to their
                            shop, barn, etc. (one customer today
                            intended to put one in his wife’s
                            “she-shed”)____

                            ____

                            With any other router we just set the
                            channel to a U-NII-1 or DFS channel.  We
                            have a fair amount of 3.65 GHz in our
                            network and then it isn’t a problem, but the
                            majority is still 5 GHz.

                            ____

-- AF mailing list
                            AF@af.afmug.com
                            http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com

-- AF mailing list
                        AF@af.afmug.com
                        http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com

-- AF mailing list
                    AF@af.afmug.com
                    http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com

                
------------------------------------------------------------------------
-- AF mailing list
                AF@af.afmug.com
                http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com

-- AF mailing list
                AF@af.afmug.com
                http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com

            
------------------------------------------------------------------------
-- AF mailing list
            AF@af.afmug.com
            http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com

-- AF mailing list
            AF@af.afmug.com
            http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com

        ------------------------------------------------------------------------
-- AF mailing list
        AF@af.afmug.com
        http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com

-- AF mailing list
        AF@af.afmug.com
        http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com

    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
-- AF mailing list
    AF@af.afmug.com <mailto:AF@af.afmug.com>
    http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com

-- AF mailing list
    AF@af.afmug.com <mailto:AF@af.afmug.com>
    http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com




--
AF mailing list
AF@af.afmug.com
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com

Reply via email to