|
The biggest win in the 450M department is the vast improvement in
the SNR incoming to the AP.
bp
<part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com>
On 6/19/2019 1:06 PM, dave wrote:
I think cust density is important here.
A 450i will even get more subs than epmp ever thought due to
protocol restrictions,processor and memory capacity.
A 450m is great if you have 60+ subs on one AP.
On 6/19/19 11:23 AM, Josh Baird
wrote:
We have a site that has 3-4 fairly loaded ePMP 2K
sectors (30 deg horns). There are a large number of customers
in a single 90 degrees. While we could probably upgrade to
ePMP 3K to get a bit of a boost, there is still a cost
associated in replacing all the CPE to get the full benefit.
At this point, we're trying to determine if something
like 450M makes sense for this 90 degrees of coverage. The
cost is obviously much higher, but I think it may be a
better solution in the long run. If we could find a spare
20Mhz, we could run both our existing ePMP radios and the
450M at the same time while we cut subscribers over.
Are there other people here who have been in similar
situations and have deployed 450M? I realize the
performance of the 450M is dependent upon CPE locations, but
overall, were you happy with the boost in performance in
general? I feel like most people who have upgraded to 450M
were already running 450, so you didn't really have to
forklift all CPE. If that were the case, I think it would
be a no-brainer.
Interested in hearing any success (or failure) stories
about people who have upgraded to 450M...
|
--
AF mailing list
AF@af.afmug.com
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
