The Cambium-compatible version of the PowerInjector plus sync is what you're looking for. The product is done, it's now just ramping up production on it. It will be orderable by WISPAPALOOZA, and shipping by the end of November, possibly even the end of October. We're just going through production rampup on it.
A challenge is that I'm out of town 4+ weeks of the next 6. I'm hoping to get this out during the brief week and a half window of time that I'm physically in the office around the end of October, but it will be tight and that isn't a guarantee. On Wed, Oct 3, 2018 at 7:56 AM Dave <[email protected]> wrote: > Forrest, > I have not purchased any of your products in a long while till this issue > I ran into where the cmm5 was limited on physical > dimension to be used top side. > So, I immediately started work on my own design to help support what I > think would be helpful. The products you have that fit that design will > work for most deployments which is where I got the idea,but I am looking > for that module for the 450i/m line with the same performance or similar to > the cmm5. > > Dave > > > On 10/03/2018 08:40 AM, Forrest Christian (List Account) wrote: > > I'm a bit confused.... > > We've been shipping web-enabled cambium-compatible sync products in the > DIN rail form factor for years. It's called a SiteMonitor base unit in > combination with one or more powerinjector+sync products (and the > SyncInjectors before them). All a RackInjector is is the > powerinjector+sync product in combination with what will become the > Sitemonitor Base Unit III hardware. But you don't get any real meaningful > functionality difference between the been-shipping-for-years din mount > product and a RackInjector other than the prettier web interface and a > different form factor. Heck, until just recently the RackInjector didn't > have SNMP and the older hardware did. > > The reason why I asked what product you were referring to is the only > shortcoming of the din rail form factor has been the lack of cambium-style > sync such as is used by the 450i/450m. We launched that hardware in the > RackInjector form factor because we knew we would need some more > engineering work to be done to be able to fit it back in the power injector > case. We also wanted to make sure it could work standalone (without a > base unit) and run off of either + or - supplies. If you sniff around on > the PacketFlux website over the next few days I have a feeling you'll find > a cambium sync version of the PowerInjector which appears sometime shortly > before WISPAPALOOZA, with shipments starting 30-45 days after. > > The SiteMonitor III is going to be a while later. We have 2 > additional updated products launching at WISPAPALOOZA, all of which are a > result of the engineering which was done for the above product. > Specifically the SiteMontior single port din rail mount injector and the 5 > channel PDU are both now polarity agnostic. There might be another couple > of products which come out in short succession afterwards, depending on how > testing on prototype boards goes. But this has all taken time away from > the Base III, which sort of has been put on the back burner until we can > clear these other products out. > > > On Wed, Oct 3, 2018 at 7:12 AM Dave <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Seems I am not the only one looking for a more compact tower top >> solution. >> Ive beat cambium till the horse died about the cmm5 physical limitations >> it has. >> Currently I am deploying the rack injector inside a DDB cabinet at 250' >> with hardened >> fiber switches to meet connections at that level. >> As you can see this a fairly large cabinet with a lot of stuff in it to >> not only provide the level protection but ease of >> maintenance and performance criteria. >> I would like to see something in the range of a CMM4 box with just DIN >> rail modules for this same reason. >> I have used some Rhino Power supplies to accommodate power if needed to >> meet 24 or 48v. >> Forrest you almost have the complete design to make your cards fit a >> Dinrail size box and add the controller in another din box. This would be >> the solution for the size we need to build these boxes to a much more >> manageable size. >> >> my 2cents >> >> >> On 10/03/2018 03:18 AM, Forrest Christian (List Account) wrote: >> >> I'm not sure I know which possibly in development product you're talking >> about. >> >> There are various products in various stages of development, not sure if >> any of them match the description 'compact rack injector'. >> >> On Tue, Oct 2, 2018 at 10:26 PM Jon Langeler <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> Is this still being developed? >>> >>> Jon Langeler >>> Michwave Technologies, Inc. >>> >>> >>> -- >>> AF mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com >>> >> >> >> -- >> *Forrest Christian* *CEO**, PacketFlux Technologies, Inc.* >> Tel: 406-449-3345 | Address: 3577 Countryside Road, Helena, MT 59602 >> [email protected] | http://www.packetflux.com >> <http://www.linkedin.com/in/fwchristian> >> <http://facebook.com/packetflux> <http://twitter.com/@packetflux> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> -- >> AF mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com >> > > > -- > *Forrest Christian* *CEO**, PacketFlux Technologies, Inc.* > Tel: 406-449-3345 | Address: 3577 Countryside Road, Helena, MT 59602 > [email protected] | http://www.packetflux.com > <http://www.linkedin.com/in/fwchristian> <http://facebook.com/packetflux> > <http://twitter.com/@packetflux> > > > > > -- > -- > AF mailing list > [email protected] > http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com > -- *Forrest Christian* *CEO**, PacketFlux Technologies, Inc.* Tel: 406-449-3345 | Address: 3577 Countryside Road, Helena, MT 59602 [email protected] | http://www.packetflux.com <http://www.linkedin.com/in/fwchristian> <http://facebook.com/packetflux> <http://twitter.com/@packetflux>
-- AF mailing list [email protected] http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
