Hi,
As Danillo mentioned it's correct that
V201209 -> ("ImpressionShare") corresponds to V201302 -> (
“SearchImpressionShare” and “ContentImpressionShare” )
V201209 -> ("BudgetLostImpressionShare") corresponds to V201302 -> (
“SearchBudgetLostImpressionShare” and “ContentBudgetLostImpressionShare” )
V201209 -> ("QualityLostImpressionShare") corresponds to V201302 -> (
“SearchRankLostImpressionShare” and “ContentRankLostImpressionShare” )
But it's not the case that SearchImpressionShare + ContentImpressionShare =
ImpressionShare ( as I wrote in this thread previously)
Best,
- Takeshi
On Wednesday, July 3, 2013 5:47:12 PM UTC+9, Kiran wrote:
>
> Hi Takeshi,
>
>
>
> Thanks for responding!! I read the post provided by you. (It’s actually
> posted by me only :) ) But I wanted a confirmation on the reply that I got,
> so I reposted same query in this thread.
>
>
>
> *I would request you to please confirm whether we can go with following
> changes for v201302.*
>
>
>
> V201209 -> ("ImpressionShare") *corresponds to *V201302 -> (
> “SearchImpressionShare” + “ContentImpressionShare” )
>
> V201209 -> ("BudgetLostImpressionShare") *corresponds to *V201302 -> (
> “SearchBudgetLostImpressionShare” + “ContentBudgetLostImpressionShare” )
>
> V201209 -> ("QualityLostImpressionShare") *corresponds to *V201302 -> (
> “SearchRankLostImpressionShare” + “ContentRankLostImpressionShare” )
>
>
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Kiran
>
>
> On Wednesday, July 3, 2013 1:54:16 PM UTC+5:30, Takeshi Hagikura (AdWords
> API Team) wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Please see this thread.
>> https://groups.google.com/d/msg/adwords-api/E9o8_GWrC2Q/0dtAc3Vg7K4J
>>
>> Best,
>> - Takeshi
>>
>> On Tuesday, July 2, 2013 4:12:06 PM UTC+9, Kiran wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Hi Takeshi,
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> I am upgrading from *V201209* to *V201302*. When extracting the
>>> campaign performance report (via *v201302*) I figured that the report
>>> definition does not like "ImpressionShare", "BudgetLostImpressionShare" and
>>> "QualityLostImpressionShare" fields.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Kindly suggest alternate fields in new version for following:
>>>
>>> V201209 -> ("ImpressionShare") *corresponds to *V201302 -> *???*
>>>
>>> V201209 -> ("BudgetLostImpressionShare") *corresponds to *V201302 -> *
>>> ???*
>>>
>>> V201209 -> ("QualityLostImpressionShare") *corresponds to *V201302 -> *
>>> ???*
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>> Kiran
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Monday, June 24, 2013 1:11:04 PM UTC+5:30, Takeshi Hagikura (AdWords
>>> API Team) wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> As mentioned in the
>>>> blog<http://googleadsdeveloper.blogspot.ru/2012/12/impression-share-reporting-changes.html>,
>>>>
>>>> now we have distinct impression shares for Search and Content networks so
>>>> that you can separate these metrics for original ones.
>>>> So it's not the case "ImpressionShare = Sum of ContentImpressionShare
>>>> & SearchImpressionShare"
>>>>
>>>> Basically it's true where 1 = SearchImpressionShare
>>>> + SearchBudgetLostImpressionShare + SearchRankLostImpressionShare
>>>> and 1 = ContentImpressionShare + ContentBudgetLostImpressionShare
>>>> + ContentRankLostImpressionShare
>>>>
>>>> We've phased out QualityLostImpressionShare metric. But I think with
>>>> the new metric columns it's more obvious what measures should be taken.
>>>> (e.g. If the SearchRankLostImpressionShare is relatively high, it's
>>>> obvious your bids are relatively low)
>>>>
>>>> Best,
>>>> - Takeshi, AdWords API Team
>>>>
>>>> On Friday, June 21, 2013 9:59:39 PM UTC+9, Nakul Ringshia wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Hello
>>>>> I am upgrading from V201109 to V201302. When extracting the campaign
>>>>> performance report (via v201302) I figured that the report definition
>>>>> does
>>>>> not like the following fields.
>>>>>
>>>>> ImpressionShare
>>>>> BudgetLostImpressionShare
>>>>>
>>>>> QualityLostImpressionShare
>>>>> Based on my understanding, it seems that these old metrics have been
>>>>> phased out and replaced with newer ones.
>>>>>
>>>>> 1. For ImpressionShare, there is ContentImpressionShare &
>>>>> SearchImpressionShare
>>>>>
>>>>> 2. For BudgetLostImpressionShare, there is
>>>>> ContentBudgetLostImpressionShare & SearchBudgetLostImpressionShare
>>>>>
>>>>> I wanted to understand how the original metric is related to the new
>>>>> ones. E.g. is ImpressionShare = Sum of ContentImpressionShare &
>>>>> SearchImpressionShare? If not can you please advise on how can I fit in
>>>>> the
>>>>> newer metrics in my application
>>>>> Also we were not able to locate any replacement for
>>>>> QualityLostImpressionShare metric. Please let us know which one can we
>>>>> use?
>>>>> Thanks
>>>>> Nakul Ringshia
>>>>>
>>>>
--
--
=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~
Also find us on our blog and discussion group:
http://adwordsapi.blogspot.com
http://groups.google.com/group/adwords-api
=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "AdWords API Forum" group.
To post to this group, send email to adwords-api@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
adwords-api+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/adwords-api?hl=en
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"AdWords API Forum" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to adwords-api+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
