Just an interesting little tidbit. I thought I would get around this little
quirk by calling my management class 'Default'. This would reduce the
confusion and it is a name that suits the class. YOU CAN'T. I stuck with
'standard'.
-----Original Message-----
From: Richard Sims [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, April 18, 2001 11:20 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: AW: finding unused mgmt classes - why didn't this work?
>This says that my class name is "DEFAULT", but I don't have a class name
>"DEFAULT", it's called "STANDARD". Here "DEFAULT" would seem to be saying
>that the class name used is the default class name and not a class name
>called default. Am I understanding this correctly?
>
>Then CLASS_NAME is only the class name if it isn't the default class,
>otherwise it's DEFAULT. Or did I have too much to dream last night?
Yes, the generic identifier "DEFAULT" will be found for CLASS_NAME.
>From my notes:
In archiving: CLASS_NAME will be "DEFAULT" (the generic identifier for
the default management class) for archiving done without using ARCHmc.
Interestingly, if you use ARCHmc specifying the management class name
which is the default management class, its actual name will show up under
CLASS_NAME; and if you specify -ARCHmc=default, CLASS_NAME will be
"DEFAULT".
Life would be too dull without things like this.
Richard Sims, BU
