> On 7 Feb 2019, at 12:12, Marco Schmidt <[email protected]> wrote: > > In fact, many of the allocations we are currently making have gone through > such a recycling process. > We expect that we will continue to receive IPv4 addresses due to LIR closures > and other reasons for some time after the current IPv4 pool has been > exhausted. Thanks for correcting my mistake Marco.
- Re: [addre... Carlos Friaças via address-policy-wg
- Re: [address-policy-wg] 201... Daniel Karrenberg
- Re: [address-policy-wg]... Martin Huněk
- Re: [address-policy... Carlos Friaças via address-policy-wg
- Re: [address-p... Martin Huněk
- Re: [addre... Carlos Friaças via address-policy-wg
- Re: [address-policy-wg]... Carlos Friaças via address-policy-wg
- [address-policy-wg]... Jim Reid
- Re: [address-p... Carlos Friaças via address-policy-wg
- Re: [address-p... Marco Schmidt
- Re: [addre... Jim Reid
- Re: [address-policy... Gert Doering
- Re: [address-policy-wg] 2019-02... Jim Reid
- Re: [address-policy-wg] 201... Daniel Karrenberg
- Re: [address-policy-wg] 2019-02 New ... Peter Hessler
- Re: [address-policy-wg] 2019-02... Carlos Friaças via address-policy-wg
- Re: [address-policy-wg] 2019-02 New ... Servereasy via address-policy-wg
- Re: [address-policy-wg] 2019-02... Sander Steffann
- Re: [address-policy-wg] 2019-02... Daniel Suchy
- Re: [address-policy-wg] 201... Carlos Friaças via address-policy-wg
- Re: [address-policy-wg]... Daniel Suchy
