On 06/02/2019 11:23, Martin Huněk wrote:
>> ... >> c) It is not tenable for the RIPE NCC to require the first LIR on the >> waiting list to wait for more address space than a minimal usfeful block >> to accumulate. > > Here it starts. I would say get such a LIR what you have got (to /22 of > course). Even by means of multiple /24s. But not blocks smaller than /24, as > it would be useless. That is exactly what I wrote. > Maybe let them decide if they would like to wait for > whole /22 where there would be less then 4x /24 (in that one case). That is where the implementation would become very complicated since it needs to be perceived as 'fair'. I see no good reason for this complication. > ... Keep /22 possibility so the > complete runout of IPv4 won't be postponed. See above. I do not see the point about 'complete runout'. We *have* run out already. This is about the very very tail end. Daniel
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
