Hi Martin, > I don't think that we have to change current policy at all. > > Current policy allows to get /22 divided to smaller blocks, so it doesn't > have to be changed just because of this. > > My personal opinion on IPv4 exhaustion is that it would be better to come > sooner than later. Any means of slowing exhaustion down would just prolong > the IPv4 agony. Reaching zero free pool is the only way.
Please look at the presentation I linked to and Daniel's comment. > Please stop trying to conserve any more IPv4 addresses, IPv4 has reached a > dead-end, let it die peacefully. This is not about conserving IPv4 addresses. Sander
