Hi Raymond, > To make it more clear what I mean, a /24 will not be enough to connect a say > /29 IPv6 to the v4 world, a /22 ( or any range of addresses up to a /22 in > size ) is not enough either. Therefore I support the current policy, and am > against the new proposal.
Can you please explain how you see that? This proposal only deals with the situation *after* the current policy becomes useless... Cheers, Sander
