On Apr 8, 2024, at 09:23, Marco Tiloca <marco.til...@ri.se> wrote:
Hello Paul and ACE,
In its current version -06, the document
draft-ietf-ace-revoked-token-notification [0] uses a custom
payload format for error responses.
While addressing the received IETF Last Call comments, the authors
would also like to make a change for using Problem Details (RFC
9290 [1]) as payload format for error responses.
I have no objections to this. If anyone in the WG objects, please speak soon.
Paul
Other than being appropriate per se, the same change:
* has recently happened in draft-ietf-ace-key-groupcomm and
draft-ietf-ace-oscore-gm-admin
* has happened in draft-ietf-ace-workflow-and-params as part of
updating RFC 9200; and
* is planned for draft-ietf-ace-key-groupcomm-oscore, also
consistent and aligned with draft-ietf-ace-key-groupcomm
Absent objections, the authors plan to make this change and use
the Problem Details format, when addressing the comments received
during the IETF Last Call and producing version -07 of the draft.
Thanks,
/Marco
[0]
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ace-revoked-token-notification/
[1] https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc9290.html
--
Marco Tiloca
Ph.D., Senior Researcher
Phone: +46 (0)70 60 46 501
RISE Research Institutes of Sweden AB
Box 1263
164 29 Kista (Sweden)
Division: Digital Systems
Department: Computer Science
Unit: Cybersecurity
https://www.ri.se
<OpenPGP_0xEE2664B40E58DA43.asc>
|
_______________________________________________
Ace mailing list
Ace@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ace
