Hello Paul and ACE,In its current version -06, the document draft-ietf-ace-revoked-token-notification [0] uses a custom payload format for error responses.
While addressing the received IETF Last Call comments, the authors would also like to make a change for using Problem Details (RFC 9290 [1]) as payload format for error responses.
Other than being appropriate per se, the same change:* has recently happened in draft-ietf-ace-key-groupcomm and draft-ietf-ace-oscore-gm-admin
* has happened in draft-ietf-ace-workflow-and-params as part of updating RFC 9200; and
* is planned for draft-ietf-ace-key-groupcomm-oscore, also consistent and aligned with draft-ietf-ace-key-groupcomm
Absent objections, the authors plan to make this change and use the Problem Details format, when addressing the comments received during the IETF Last Call and producing version -07 of the draft.
Thanks, /Marco[0] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ace-revoked-token-notification/
[1] https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc9290.html -- Marco Tiloca Ph.D., Senior Researcher Phone: +46 (0)70 60 46 501 RISE Research Institutes of Sweden AB Box 1263 164 29 Kista (Sweden) Division: Digital Systems Department: Computer Science Unit: Cybersecurity https://www.ri.se
OpenPGP_0xEE2664B40E58DA43.asc
Description: OpenPGP public key
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Ace mailing list Ace@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ace
