i have not used a pi zero, but i did try a pi 3b the last time i tried the 9front wifi driver (back ported to richard’s pi port) i struggled with latency issues. and latency delays are a killer for 9p performance.
i experimented with cfs(8) and another more aggressive caching filesystem from charles, but i couldn't get it to perform anything like how wired ether. having said this things may well have changed, this was about 3 years ago. -Steve > On 8 Aug 2024, at 9:27 pm, adventures in9 <adventures...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Miller's pi code does have a basic spi driver. A 9front one is on my > to-do, but I'm very busy with other non-computer stuff for a while, so > I'm not sure when or if I will get to it. I have several other single > board computer like devices that are a higher priority to me. > > 9Front does have a pi wifi driver now. I've tested it on pi 3B and > 3B+. Only issue I've had is that, since wifi uses sdio, it can > conflict with the sd card. I've heard 4B doesn't have this issue, but > I don't have a 4B to test myself. > > And I'm not sure what ehternet on a pi zero means. pi zero doesn't > come with an rj45 jack, so is this some add-on card to provide > ethernet? > >> On Thu, Aug 8, 2024 at 9:27 AM Steve Simon <st...@quintile.net> wrote: >> >> fwiw. i am pretty sure there was a plan9 raspberry pi spi driver, though >> this was for richard millers package - it may not (yet) be ported to 9front. >> >> i cannot remember if it was Richard's code or someone else's. check the >> 9fans archives -generally a good idea for any plan9 related questions. >> >> -Steve >> >> On 8 Aug 2024, at 5:37 pm, Clout Tolstoy <tolstoycl...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> >> You might want to question your own ability to judge if something is written >> with an LLM if you for a second thought or think I use them for email. >> Which also appears to be a problem on this list. People playing kangaroo >> court on who's using an LLM and when. And now it's not even about SPI, >> plan 9 driver support, Ethernet and wifi support on a rpi zeroW. Wtf, and >> go derail elsewhere with your paranoia. >> >>> On Thu, Aug 8, 2024, 6:57 AM <vester.thac...@fastmail.fm> wrote: >>> >>> On Thu, Aug 8, 2024, at 21:27, Thaddeus Woskowiak wrote: >>>> All I ask (as well as others) is to be up front with LLM answers. Note: I'm >>>> not making accusations here, just a general statement. >>>> >>>> There's been far too much discourse here which is eroding the trust and >>>> quality of the list. I ask that we please be as civil as possible as well >>>> as honest and up front with our answers. There is no need to rush to answer >>>> questions, there's no prize or pot of gold. There is no life, property or >>>> money at stake here - plan 9 is mostly a labor of love. And that is what we >>>> should be displaying towards each other - love and respect. >>>> >>>> - taw >>> >>> I have noticed the emergence of LLMs in email clients and >>> word processors. Additionally, the need to cut and paste >>> results has been eliminated, making the integration seamless >>> and LLM usage soon commonplace. Based on earlier >>> discussions, it is important to disclose their use to >>> maintain transparency and trust; otherwise, we may see >>> increased conflict on the mailing list, both warranted and >>> unwarranted. It is easier and more honest to disclose their >>> use rather than calling out suspected users and diminishing >>> trust. >>> >>> Written with Outlook, which contains LLM recommendations >>> for grammar, wording, and automated responses. >>> >>> -Vic >> >> 9fans / 9fans / see discussions + participants + delivery options Permalink ------------------------------------------ 9fans: 9fans Permalink: https://9fans.topicbox.com/groups/9fans/T70ec2e35f6d6a36f-Mf69a435ad55903e6e0c6d506 Delivery options: https://9fans.topicbox.com/groups/9fans/subscription