ethan you think your no-one driver/mobule is not too bad i also something something something /c2021081105:37
On Mon, Sep 20, 2021 at 8:58 AM Conor Williams <conor.willi...@gmail.com> wrote: > and dr john nelson in University Limerick -- a fine reputable uni down > south ireland (with > loads of good professor types and students (most of them anyways) > stole my fyp and bought me lunch and said nothing about nothing and then > told me to > fuck off over the phone when i was enquiring about doing a phd which i will > and has links into the psychaitric system and they keep locking me up to > hide their slimy pasts > and that my friends is not the end of that parrticular conundrum... keep > posted on irc... will let > u know what channel /c:202109200858:51 > > On Mon, Sep 20, 2021 at 8:52 AM Conor Williams <conor.willi...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> and tim roberts on an unrelated topic is a bunch of un-ethical hackers >> diminishing the intellect of the humanity /c:202109200851 >> hack the planet my fiends... >> >> On Mon, Sep 20, 2021 at 8:45 AM Conor Williams <conor.willi...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>> i figured out the random hack which messed me up 12 years ago 2 days ago >>> /c:f20 >>> and the buda bug is fixed on my system - took me 3 days strait to find >>> it... >>> and the fuseblk hack took a while /c:2021 >>> >>> On Mon, Sep 20, 2021 at 8:39 AM Conor Williams <conor.willi...@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> if it is a vfat filesystem it is ok.... >>>> >>>> On Mon, Sep 20, 2021 at 8:37 AM Conor Williams < >>>> conor.willi...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> some of the fuseblk disc/k drivers/modules on peppermint which is a >>>>> flavour of ubuntu >>>>> are not even in the kernel space and there are mount.XYZ processes >>>>> left open which are >>>>> wide open to attack (with # fuser -p <PID>) /c09 >>>>> for those chips tings >>>>> >>>>> On Mon, Sep 20, 2021 at 8:24 AM hiro <23h...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> i think the main reason people are willing to fall for the android >>>>>> platform is bec. there is no good long-term supply of updated phone >>>>>> hardware with backwards-compatible interfaces. >>>>>> >>>>>> a lot of qualcomm and mediatek chipsets are being built, but instead >>>>>> of documentation they only ship half-baked linux drivers, which are >>>>>> often not even mainlined. >>>>>> >>>>>> those linux drivers are already hard to make work on actual linux >>>>>> distributions, or even on android distributions. >>>>>> >>>>>> who wants to reverse-engineer the hardware over and over again based >>>>>> on such linux drivers... >>>>>> >>>>>> On 9/20/21, Ethan Gardener <eeke...@fastmail.fm> wrote: >>>>>> > tl;dr: forget inferno, port plan 9 to the pine phone. >>>>>> > >>>>>> > On Mon, Sep 20, 2021, at 6:43 AM, Dave Eckhardt wrote: >>>>>> >> > Anyone know if this project went anywhere? >>>>>> >> > >>>>>> >> > https://www.cs.cmu.edu/~412/lectures/L05_Purge_Proposal.pdf >>>>>> > >>>>>> > I had to laugh at one of the slides. Inferno running natively on >>>>>> "x86 >>>>>> > supercomputer"? I think implementing multicore support would be a >>>>>> first >>>>>> > step, not to mention 64-bit! While it would be nice if those jobs >>>>>> were done, >>>>>> > they will take time and effort. Overall, if porting natively, I see >>>>>> little >>>>>> > sense in preferring Inferno to Plan 9, especially as Plan 9 already >>>>>> supports >>>>>> > 64-bit multicore. >>>>>> > >>>>>> >> Sadly, not. One issue is that modern Android releases don't >>>>>> >> support 32-bit executables, and at the time that project was >>>>>> >> attempted Inferno was somewhat 32-bit (I haven't looked since). >>>>>> > >>>>>> > Recalling the issues Hellaphone had and the time it took, I'm of >>>>>> the opinion >>>>>> > that getting Inferno to work on any given phone's Linux kernel is >>>>>> hardly >>>>>> > more worthwhile than porting it directly to the hardware. The >>>>>> kernels have >>>>>> > undocumented interfaces. >>>>>> > >>>>>> > A current thread on OSdev (operating system development) forums is >>>>>> looking >>>>>> > at phones. It's a little rambly, but it reports on some encouraging >>>>>> things. >>>>>> > Lots of "baseband processors" (the phone-network communication >>>>>> subsystems) >>>>>> > have documented interfaces. There are at least 2 phones available >>>>>> now which >>>>>> > are fully open for operating system development: the PinePhone and >>>>>> the >>>>>> > Librem 5. (5 is the screen size.) Of the 2, the Pine Phone seems >>>>>> better, not >>>>>> > least because it can boot from the SD card; useful for testing. >>>>>> > https://forum.osdev.org/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=53251 >>>>>> > >>>>>> > There's also the option of building your own phone out of >>>>>> components. The >>>>>> > thread has some info. I'm guessing most here would prefer a >>>>>> PinePhone. >>>>>> >> But I think I saw some recent-ish Inferno-on-Android activity here: >>>>>> >> >>>>>> >> https://github.com/bhgv/Inferno-OS-bhgv >>>>>> > >>>>>> > That's probably a good source of code. bhgv is a freelance >>>>>> programmer who >>>>>> > was very interested in Inferno and made several improvements >>>>>> including >>>>>> > Truetype fonts. The last I heard was he tried to find paid work >>>>>> involving >>>>>> > Inferno but couldn't, so he didn't have time to work on it. >>>>>> >>>>>> ------------------------------------------ >>>>>> 9fans: 9fans >>>>>> Permalink: >>>>>> https://9fans.topicbox.com/groups/9fans/T39aec8f3f9d8503d-M0f66e73ea984adbad982f776 >>>>>> Delivery options: >>>>>> https://9fans.topicbox.com/groups/9fans/subscription >>>>>> ------------------------------------------ 9fans: 9fans Permalink: https://9fans.topicbox.com/groups/9fans/T39aec8f3f9d8503d-M0f2c2ce902355bf729901f86 Delivery options: https://9fans.topicbox.com/groups/9fans/subscription
