> there are lots of small ways to improve things, too.  i'd be happy
> to talk about that on or off list.  one thing that immediately springs
> to mind is additions to charles' kernel man pages.

The list is not very busy and, I hate to admit, somewhat remote from
Bell Labs.  As a result, I think there would be no serious objection
to add pertinent traffic to it.

Personally, kernel pages would be a god-send (but an update of Nemo's
commentaries would be even more so) and I would like to add discussion
on the various Plan 9 flavours and how their differences should be
consolidated or, if necessary, properly set down as distinguishing
features.

The same for patches that have not yet been accepted in the Bell Labs
release, I believe they ought to be discussed here with a view to make
them conform, where necessary, to Bell Labs' specifications so they
can be incorporated.

Maybe the long term discussions belong elesewhere, but right now, here
is where we all are.

++L



Reply via email to