This whole discussion has been absurd. On Apr 5, 2011 11:50 AM, "ron minnich" <rminn...@gmail.com> wrote: > This discussion is interesting. > > "rc is not as good a shell as bash because it lacks built-ins that > make it a good programming language for writing an acme extension" > > Did I summarizer it correctly? Once summarized, am I the only one who > finds it absurd? > > ron >
- Re: [9fans] Making read(1) an rc(1) builtin? andrey mirtchovski
- Re: [9fans] Making read(1) an rc(1) builtin? Bakul Shah
- Re: [9fans] Making read(1) an rc(1) builtin? roger peppe
- Re: [9fans] Making read(1) an rc(1) builtin? erik quanstrom
- Re: [9fans] Making read(1) an rc(1) builtin? Yaroslav
- Re: [9fans] Making read(1) an rc(1) builtin? Greg Comeau
- Re: [9fans] Making read(1) an rc(1) builtin? erik quanstrom
- Re: [9fans] Making read(1) an rc(1) builtin? Greg Comeau
- Re: [9fans] Making read(1) an rc(1) builtin? roger peppe
- Re: [9fans] Making read(1) an rc(1) builtin? ron minnich
- Re: [9fans] Making read(1) an rc(1) builtin? Jacob Todd
- Re: [9fans] Making read(1) an rc(1) builtin? erik quanstrom
- Re: [9fans] Making read(1) an rc(1) builtin? Rudolf Sykora
- Re: [9fans] Making read(1) an rc(1) builtin? ron minnich
- Re: [9fans] Making read(1) an rc(1) builtin? smiley
- Re: [9fans] Making read(1) an rc(1) builtin? erik quanstrom
- Re: [9fans] Making read(1) an rc(1) builtin? Yaroslav
- Re: [9fans] Making read(1) an rc(1) builtin? smiley
- Re: [9fans] Making read(1) an rc(1) builtin? Jacob Todd
- [9fans] Busy mouse WAS: Re: Making read(1) an ... smiley
- Re: [9fans] Busy mouse WAS: Re: Making read(1)... erik quanstrom