On Mon, 6 Jul 2009 13:36:35 -0700 John Floren <slawmas...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 6, 2009 at 1:33 PM, Ethan Grammatikidis<eeke...@fastmail.fm> > wrote: > > On Mon, 6 Jul 2009 20:57:19 +0200 > > cinap_len...@gmx.de wrote: > > > >> yeah... connecting terminals to warp energy plasma conduits > >> seems to be a bad idea. > > > > Yeah, it's also a deeply wierd thing to do unless the terminals require at > > least several megawatts. O.o Each... I can't think of any reason for that. > > The displays may be print-quality (2000dpi) and the touch layer supposedly > > able to read fingerprints, but that's not far beyond current tech. > > Superluminal signalling signalling seems not to require much power as the > > tiny com badges feature delay-free communication at least as far as lunar > > orbit. Yes I've done this before. :) > > > > How far off topic are we now? Can we get away with carrying on? :) > > > > I'm willing to invoke Godwin to prevent carrying on. Yeah, a couple of short steps from here and I'm sure I'd find myself arguing something highly controversial, (via political reasons for the vulnerable centralised computer architecture,) so I'll shut up now. > > John > -- > "I've tried programming Ruby on Rails, following TechCrunch in my RSS > reader, and drinking absinthe. It doesn't work. I'm going back to C, > Hunter S. Thompson, and cheap whiskey." -- Ted Dziuba > -- Ethan Grammatikidis Those who are slower at parsing information must necessarily be faster at problem-solving.
