On Mon, 6 Jul 2009 13:36:35 -0700
John Floren <slawmas...@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Mon, Jul 6, 2009 at 1:33 PM, Ethan Grammatikidis<eeke...@fastmail.fm> 
> wrote:
> > On Mon, 6 Jul 2009 20:57:19 +0200
> > cinap_len...@gmx.de wrote:
> >
> >> yeah... connecting terminals to warp energy plasma conduits
> >> seems to be a bad idea.
> >
> > Yeah, it's also a deeply wierd thing to do unless the terminals require at 
> > least several megawatts. O.o Each... I can't think of any reason for that. 
> > The displays may be print-quality (2000dpi) and the touch layer supposedly 
> > able to read fingerprints, but that's not far beyond current tech. 
> > Superluminal signalling signalling seems not to require much power as the 
> > tiny com badges feature delay-free communication at least as far as lunar 
> > orbit. Yes I've done this before. :)
> >
> > How far off topic are we now? Can we get away with carrying on? :)
> >
> 
> I'm willing to invoke Godwin to prevent carrying on.

Yeah, a couple of short steps from here and I'm sure I'd find myself arguing 
something highly controversial, (via political reasons for the vulnerable 
centralised computer architecture,) so I'll shut up now.

> 
> John
> -- 
> "I've tried programming Ruby on Rails, following TechCrunch in my RSS
> reader, and drinking absinthe. It doesn't work. I'm going back to C,
> Hunter S. Thompson, and cheap whiskey." -- Ted Dziuba
> 


-- 
Ethan Grammatikidis

Those who are slower at parsing information must
necessarily be faster at problem-solving.

Reply via email to