On Sep 25, 2012, at 1:46 PM, Jim Klimov <jimkli...@cos.ru> wrote: > 2012-09-24 21:08, Jason Usher wrote: >>> Ok, thank you. The problem with this is, the >>> compressratio only goes to two significant digits, which >>> means if I do the math, I'm only getting an >>> approximation. Since we may use these numbers to >>> compute billing, it is important to get it right. >>> >>> Is there any way at all to get the real *exact* number ? > > Well, if you take into account snapshots and clones, > you can see really small "used" numbers on datasets > which reference a lot of data. > > In fact, for accounting you might be better off with > the "referenced" field instead of "used", but note > that it is not "recursive" and you need to account > each child dataset's byte references separately. > > I am not sure if there is a simple way to get exact > byte-counts instead of roundings like "422M"...
zfs get -p -- richard -- illumos Day & ZFS Day, Oct 1-2, 2012 San Fransisco www.zfsday.com richard.ell...@richardelling.com +1-760-896-4422
_______________________________________________ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
