> -----Original Message----- > From: Richard Elling [mailto:richard.ell...@gmail.com] > Sent: 星期三, 六月 15, 2011 11:59 > To: Fred Liu > Cc: Jim Klimov; zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org > Subject: Re: [zfs-discuss] zfs global hot spares? > > On Jun 14, 2011, at 2:36 PM, Fred Liu wrote: > > > What is the difference between warm spares and hot spares? > > Warm spares are connected and powered. Hot spares are connected, > powered, and automatically brought online to replace a "failed" disk. > The reason I'm leaning towards warm spares is because I see more > replacements than "failed" disks... a bad thing. > -- richard >
You mean so-called "failed" disks replaced by hot spares are not really physically damaged? Do I misunderstand? Thanks. Fred _______________________________________________ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
