On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 8:59 AM, Jim Klimov <jimkli...@cos.ru> wrote:
> Is such "tape" storage only intended for reliable media such as > another ZFS or triple-redundancy tape archive with fancy robotics? > How would it cope with BER in transfers to/from such media? Large and small businesses have been using TAPE as a BACKUP media for decades. One of the cardinal rules is that you MUST have at least TWO FULL copies if you expect to be able to use them. An Incremental backup is marginally better than an incremental zfs send in that you _can_ recover the files contained in the backup image. I understand why a zfs send is what it is (and you can't pull individual files out of it), and that it must be bit for bit correct, and that IF it is large, then the chances of a bit error are higher. But given all that, I still have not heard a good reason NOT to keep zfs send stream images around as insurance. Yes, they must not be corrupt (that is true for ANY backup storage), and if they do get corrupted you cannot (without tweeks that may jeopardize the data integrity) "restore" that stream image. But this really is not a higher bar than for any other "backup" system. This is why I wondered at the original posters comment that he had made a critical mistake (unless the mistake was using storage for the image that had a high chance of corruption and did not have a second copy of the image). Sorry if that has been discussed here before, how much of this list I get to read depends on how busy I am. Right now I am very busy moving 20 TB of data from one configuration of 14 zpools to a configuration of one zpool (and only one dataset, no zfs send / recv for me), so I have lots of time to wait, and I spend some of that time reading this list :-) P.S. This data is "backed up", both the old and new configuration via regular zfs snapshots (for day to day needs) and zfs send / recv replication to a remote site (for DR needs). The initial zfs full send occurred when the new zpool was new and empty, so I only have to push the incrementals through the WAN link. -- {--------1---------2---------3---------4---------5---------6---------7---------} Paul Kraus -> Senior Systems Architect, Garnet River ( http://www.garnetriver.com/ ) -> Sound Coordinator, Schenectady Light Opera Company ( http://www.sloctheater.org/ ) -> Technical Advisor, RPI Players _______________________________________________ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss