On May 24, 2011, at 11:30 AM, Hans Rattink wrote: > Hi Erik and Kebabber, > > Thanks for your answers. Do i summarize it right saying: the best conclusion > would be then that Nexenta has it's own version of ZFS and has nothing to > fear of Oracle other ZFS-developpers but that it's uncertain what NetApp > might come up with as the details aren't published? > > Still i wonder what Gartner means with Oracle monetizing on ZFS...
Simply means that if you want ZFS from Oracle, you have to pay money. > Perhaps that the advantage of ZFS for others like Compellent (and with that, > NexentaStor as well) might be become less in future if Oracle speeds up their > implementation of it? There are many ZFS implementations, each evolving as the contributors desire. Diversity and innovation is a good thing. -- richard _______________________________________________ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
