IMHO, oracle would prefer customer go with ZFS appliance with added WebGUI and all the extra support like Analytics, L2ARc and ZIL with SSD etc
On 5/24/2011 2:30 PM, Hans Rattink wrote:
Hi Erik and Kebabber, Thanks for your answers. Do i summarize it right saying: the best conclusion would be then that Nexenta has it's own version of ZFS and has nothing to fear of Oracle other ZFS-developpers but that it's uncertain what NetApp might come up with as the details aren't published? Still i wonder what Gartner means with Oracle monetizing on ZFS... Perhaps that the advantage of ZFS for others like Compellent (and with that, NexentaStor as well) might be become less in future if Oracle speeds up their implementation of it? Regards, Hans
<<attachment: laotsao.vcf>>
_______________________________________________ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
