On 03/23/11 09:07 AM, Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote:
On Sun, Mar 20, 2011 at 01:54:54PM +0700, Fajar A. Nugraha wrote:
On Sun, Mar 20, 2011 at 4:05 AM, Pawel Jakub Dawidek<p...@freebsd.org> wrote:
On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 06:22:01PM -0700, Garrett D'Amore wrote:
Newer versions of FreeBSD have newer ZFS code.
Yes, we are at v28 at this point (the lastest open-source version).
That said, ZFS on FreeBSD is kind of a 2nd class citizen still. [...]
That's actually not true. There are more FreeBSD committers working on
ZFS than on UFS.
How is the performance of ZFS under FreeBSD? Is it comparable to that
in Solaris, or still slower due to some needed compatibility layer?
This compatibility layer is just a bunch of ugly defines, etc. to allow
for less code modifications. It introduces no overhead.
I made performance comparison between FreeBSD 9 with ZFSv28 and Solaris
11 Express, but I don't think Solaris license allows me to publish the
results. But believe me, the results were very surprising:)
You can compare OpenIndiana oi_148 (and oi148a with IllumOS) and publish
comparisons.
I think site: Phoronix.com already did comparisons with ZFS under
several platforms and other (Linux) file systems without sweat.
_______________________________________________
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
