Probably, we need place a tag before zfs -- Opensource-ZFS or Oracle-ZFS after Solaris11 release. If it is true, these two ZFSes will definitely evolve into different directions. BTW, Did Oracle unveil the actual release date? We are also at the cross road...
Thanks. Fred > -----Original Message----- > From: zfs-discuss-boun...@opensolaris.org [mailto:zfs-discuss- > boun...@opensolaris.org] On Behalf Of Fajar A. Nugraha > Sent: 星期日, 三月 20, 2011 14:55 > To: Pawel Jakub Dawidek > Cc: openindiana-disc...@openindiana.org; zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org > Subject: Re: [zfs-discuss] best migration path from Solaris 10 > > On Sun, Mar 20, 2011 at 4:05 AM, Pawel Jakub Dawidek <p...@freebsd.org> > wrote: > > On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 06:22:01PM -0700, Garrett D'Amore wrote: > >> Newer versions of FreeBSD have newer ZFS code. > > > > Yes, we are at v28 at this point (the lastest open-source version). > > > >> That said, ZFS on FreeBSD is kind of a 2nd class citizen still. [...] > > > > That's actually not true. There are more FreeBSD committers working > on > > ZFS than on UFS. > > How is the performance of ZFS under FreeBSD? Is it comparable to that > in Solaris, or still slower due to some needed compatibility layer? > > -- > Fajar > _______________________________________________ > zfs-discuss mailing list > zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org > http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss _______________________________________________ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
