On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 5:33 AM, Edward Ned Harvey <opensolarisisdeadlongliveopensola...@nedharvey.com> wrote: > But the conclusion remains the same: Redundancy is not needed at the > client, because any data corruption the client could possibly see from the > server would be transient and self-correcting.
Weren't you just chastising someone else for not using redundancy over iSCSI? The rules don't really change for zfs-backed iSCSI disks vs. SAN iSCSI. If you don't let the client (initiator) manage redundancy, then there is no way for it to recover if there is a network, memory, or other error. -B -- Brandon High : bh...@freaks.com _______________________________________________ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
