On Wed, August 18, 2010 15:14, Linder, Doug wrote: > I've noticed that everytime someone mentions using NFS with ZFS here, they > always seem to be using NFSv3. Is there a reason for this that I just > don't know about? To me, using NFSv4 is a no-brainer. ZFS supports it > natively, it supports all the wonderful extra capabilities that the ZFS > ACLs allow, has stronger security, stateful protocol, and all kinds of > other nifty stuff. Why do people seem to be clinging so rabidly to the > old version? Is there some technical reason I'm missing?
At $WORK it's generally namespace issues: http://blogs.sun.com/tdh/entry/linux_nfsv4_namespace_implementation_fools Haven't really found a use for the "extras" that NFSv4 adds, so it's not worth the effort. _______________________________________________ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
