Jordan Schwartz wrote: > There is one large filesystem per server that is served via NFSv3 to
I've noticed that everytime someone mentions using NFS with ZFS here, they always seem to be using NFSv3. Is there a reason for this that I just don't know about? To me, using NFSv4 is a no-brainer. ZFS supports it natively, it supports all the wonderful extra capabilities that the ZFS ACLs allow, has stronger security, stateful protocol, and all kinds of other nifty stuff. Why do people seem to be clinging so rabidly to the old version? Is there some technical reason I'm missing? Doug Linder I apologize for all the stupid cruft below that my company's mail server adds. ---------- Learn more about Merchant Link at www.merchantlink.com. THIS MESSAGE IS CONFIDENTIAL. This e-mail message and any attachments are proprietary and confidential information intended only for the use of the recipient(s) named above. If you are not the intended recipient, you may not print, distribute, or copy this message or any attachments. If you have received this communication in error, please notify the sender by return e-mail and delete this message and any attachments from your computer. _______________________________________________ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
