On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 4:06 PM, Cindy Swearingen <cindy.swearin...@oracle.com> wrote: > Hi Giovanni, > > The spare behavior and the autoreplace property behavior are separate > but they should work pretty well in recent builds. > > You should not need to perform a zpool replace operation if the > autoreplace property is set. If autoreplace is set and a replacement > disk is inserted into the same physical location of the removed > failed disk, then a new disk label is applied to the replacement > disk and ZFS should recognize it.
That's what I'm having to do in b111. I will try to simulate the same situation in b134. > > Let the replacement disk resilver from the spare. When the resilver > completes, the spare should detach automatically. We saw this happen on > a disk replacement last week on a system running a recent Nevada build. > > If the spare doesn't detach after the resilver is complete, then just > detach it manually. Yes, that's working as expected (spare detaches after resilver). -- Giovanni Tirloni gtirl...@sysdroid.com _______________________________________________ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
