Sent from my iPhone
On 23 Jul 2010, at 09:42, tomwaters <tomwat...@chadmail.com> wrote: > I agree, I get apalling NFS speeds compared to CIFS/Samba..ie. CIFS/Samba of > 95-105MB and NFS of 5-20MB. > > Not the thread hijack, but I assume a SSD ZIL will similarly improve an iSCSI > target...as I am getting 2-5MB on that too. Yes, it generally will. I've seen some huge improvements with iSCSI, but YMMV depending on your config, application and workload. _______________________________________________ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
