On Fri, July 23, 2010 10:42, tomwaters wrote: > I agree, I get apalling NFS speeds compared to CIFS/Samba..ie. CIFS/Samba of > 95-105MB and NFS of > 5-20MB. > > > Not the thread hijack, but I assume a SSD ZIL will similarly improve an iSCSI > target...as I am > getting 2-5MB on that too. -- > This message posted from opensolaris.org
This is exactly the numbers I'm getting as well. What's the reason for such low rate when using iSCSI? _______________________________________________ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
