Nikola M wrote:
>Freddie Cash wrote:
>> You definitely want to do the ZFS bits from within FreeBSD.
>Why not using ZFS in OpenSolaris? At least it has most stable/tested
>implementation and also the newest one if needed?
I'd love to use OpenSolaris for exactly those reasons, but I'm wary of using an
operating system that may not continue to be updated/maintained. If
OpenSolaris
had continued to be regularly released after Oracle bought Sun I'd be choosing
it. As it is, I don't want to be pessimistic, but the doubt about
OpenSolaris's
future is enough to make me choose FreeBSD instead. (I'm sure that such
sentiments won't make me popular here, but so far Oracle has been frustratingly
silent on their plans for OpenSolaris.) At the very least, if FreeBSD doesn't
do what I want I can switch the system disk to OpenSolaris and keep using the
same pool. (Right?)
Going back to my original question: does anyone know of any problems that could
be caused by using raidz on top of encrypted drives? If there were a physical
read error, which would get amplified by the encryption layer (if I'm
understanding full-disk encryption correctly, which I may not be), would ZFS
still be able to recover?
_______________________________________________
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
