> From: zfs-discuss-boun...@opensolaris.org [mailto:zfs-discuss- > boun...@opensolaris.org] On Behalf Of Freddie Cash > > ZFS-FUSE is horribly unstable,
That may be true. I couldn't say. > although that's more an indication of > the stability of the storage stack on Linux. But this, I take issue with. Ext3 isn't unstable. It may not be as awesome as ZFS, but it isn't unstable. And the same goes for all the other storage and filesystems in Linux. Years ago, when I first started using Gimp, it was stable in Linux and not stable in Windows. I went to gimp.org, and looked at the FAQ's, and FAQ #1 said "Gimp is unstable on windows." And the reply was "Everything is unstable on Windows." Which was simply false. It was a developer (or group of developers) expressing a biased point of view, and blaming a platform that they were not fond of. In later versions of gimp, even on the same version of Windows, gimp evolved into something that was stable. To simply blame gimp, or simply blame windows, both positions are not accurate. The truth is, gimp was stable on linux, and other apps were stable on windows. The truth is, there was something unstable in the interaction between the two. _______________________________________________ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
