> From: zfs-discuss-boun...@opensolaris.org [mailto:zfs-discuss- > boun...@opensolaris.org] On Behalf Of Kyle McDonald > > If you're only sharing them to Linux machines, then NFS would be so > much > easier to use. You'll still want relative links though.
Only if you have infrastructure to sanitize the UID's. If you have disjoint "standalone" machines, then samba winbind works pretty well to map usernames to locally generated unique UID's. In which case, IMHO, samba is easier than NFS. However, if you do have some kind of domains LDAP, NIS, etc... then I agree 1,000% NFS is easier than samba. _______________________________________________ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
